【24h】

A standard muscle-sparing utility thoracotomy for VATS procedures.

机译:VATS手术的标准保留肌肉的开胸手术。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

BACKGROUNDS: Improvements in surgical equipment have rendered video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) an effective device for thoracic surgeons and nowadays several intrathoracic diseases can benefit from this approach. This development has expanded potential use and recently the technical feasibility of major lung resections by VATS has been demonstrated. The authors present their experience with a standard muscle-sparing utility thoracotomy (UT) utilized for all VATS procedures, including major lung resections. METHODS: From November 1996 to October 1997, 30 patients were operated on. There were 22 males and 8 females (medium age 58 years; range 24-78). There were 13 anatomical lung resections (i.e.: 11 lobectomies, 1 left pneumonectomy, 1 segmental resection), 8 wedge resections, 3 lung biopsies, 2 debridements of pleural empyema, 2 mediastinal nodes biopsies, 1 esophageal resection for leiomyoma, 1 excision of benign mediastinal cyst. RESULTS: No mortality or major morbidity were recorded, as well as no rib fractures due to the rib spreader. Two patients suffered from prolonged air-leaks after respectively left upper lobectomy and lung biopsy and required prolonged chest drainage. Concerning anatomic major lung resections the medium hospital stay was 7.9 days and medium chest tube time was 5.6 days. The utility thoracotomy through the auscultatory triangle proved to be a safe approach and confirmed the technical feasibility of various type of surgical procedures with results comparable to standard open thoracotomy. Our data shows that VATS approach did not seriously affect the duration of hospital stay, chest tube time, the overall morbidity or lung function. CONCLUSIONS: As the real benefit of this approach remains controversial, the majority of the studies comparing the VATS approach to conventional muscle-sparing thoracotomy neither nor prospective nor randomized, and several parameters are difficult to evaluate in the literature further study are mandatory.
机译:背景:外科手术设备的改进使电视胸腔外科手术(VATS)成为了一种适用于胸外科医生的有效设备,如今,一些胸腔内疾病可从这种方法中受益。这种发展扩大了潜在的用途,最近已经证明了VATS进行主要肺切除的技术可行性。作者介绍了他们在所有VATS手术(包括大范围肺切除术)中使用的保留标准肌肉的实用开胸术(UT)的经验。方法:1996年11月至1997年10月,手术30例。男22例,女8例(中年58岁;范围24-78)。进行了13例肺部解剖切除(即:11例肺叶切除,1例左肺切除,1例节段性切除),8例楔形切除,3例肺活检,2例胸膜积液清创,2例纵隔淋巴结活检,1例平滑肌瘤食管切除,1例良性切除。纵隔囊肿。结果:没有记录到死亡率或主要发病率,也没有因肋骨扩张器引起的肋骨骨折。两名患者分别在左上叶切除术和肺活检后经历了长时间的漏气,需要延长的胸腔引流。关于解剖学上的大肺切除术,中位住院时间为7.9天,中位胸管时间为5.6天。通过听诊三角形进行开胸手术是一种安全的方法,并证实了各种手术方法的技术可行性,其结果可与标准开胸手术相媲美。我们的数据表明,VATS方法并未严重影响住院时间,胸管时间,总体发病率或肺功能。结论:由于这种方法的真正益处仍然存在争议,因此大多数将VATS方法与传统的保留肌肉的开胸术,既无前瞻性也无随机性的研究进行了比较,并且在文献中难以评估的几个参数是强制性的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号