...
首页> 外文期刊>The Canadian journal of urology >Perineural invasion on prostate biopsy does not predict adverse pathological outcome.
【24h】

Perineural invasion on prostate biopsy does not predict adverse pathological outcome.

机译:前列腺穿刺活检的神经周围浸润不能预示不良的病理结果。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The clinical significance of perineural invasion (PNI) on prostate needle biopsy is controversial. The aim of this present study is to determine the role of PNI on prostate biopsy in predicting adverse findings at radical prostatectomy in a recent cohort of screen detected prostate cancer.We analyzed 470 patients diagnosed with prostate cancer from a prospectively maintained database at Princess Margaret Hospital. Out of the 470 patients diagnosed with prostate cancer, 139 underwent radical prostatectomy. Pathological specimens were examined, and perineural invasion was identified as carcinoma tracking along or around a nerve in the perineural space. We investigated the predictive value of PNI on biopsy with PNI on radical prostatectomy as well as the ability of PNI on prostate biopsy to predict adverse findings at radical prostatectomy.Perineural invasion was present in 124 (26%) of biopsy specimens diagnosed with prostate cancer and 94 (68%) of those who chose radical prostatectomy. Perineural invasion on prostate needle biopsy was not predictive of radical prostatectomy Gleason score (p = .377), pathological stage (p = .852), extraprostatic extension (p = .258), surgical margin (p = .079), lymphovascular invasion (p = .499), and upgrading (p = .514) or downgrading (p = .208) at radical prostatectomy. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of PNI on biopsy for PNI on radical prostatectomy were 32%, 82%, 79%, and 37% respectively. The Cohen's Kappa correlation coefficient was .11.Perineural invasion on prostate needle biopsy is not predictive of radical prostatectomy outcome. Furthermore, perineural invasion on biopsy has limited predictive value for perineural invasion at radical prostatectomy.
机译:前列腺穿刺活检的神经周围浸润(PNI)的临床意义是有争议的。本研究的目的是确定PNI在前列腺穿刺活检中预测最近筛查的前列腺癌人群中根治性前列腺切除术的不良结果中的作用。我们从玛格丽特公主医院前瞻性数据库中分析了470名被诊断为前列腺癌的患者。在470位被诊断为前列腺癌的患者中,有139位接受了前列腺癌根治术。检查了病理标本,并将神经周围浸润确定为沿着神经周围或周围神经周围的癌迹。我们调查了PNI对前列腺癌根治术的活检的预测价值以及PNI对前列腺癌根治术的不良发现的预测能力.124例(26%)诊断为前列腺癌和选择根治性前列腺切除术的患者中有94(68%)人。前列腺穿刺活检时的神经周围浸润不能预测根治性前列腺切除术的格里森评分(p = .377),病理分期(p = .852),前列腺扩展(p = .258),手术切缘(p = .079),淋巴管浸润(p = .499),并在前列腺癌根治术中进行升级(p = .514)或降级(p = .208)。 PNI活检对前列腺癌根治术的PNI敏感性,特异性,阳性预测值和阴性预测值分别为32%,82%,79%和37%。 Cohen的Kappa相关系数为0.11。前列腺穿刺活检的神经周浸润不能预测前列腺癌根治术的结局。此外,活检时神经周浸润对根治性前列腺切除术对神经周浸润的预测价值有限。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号