...
首页> 外文期刊>The American surgeon. >Denver Peritoneovenous Shunts for the Management of Malignant Ascites: A Review of the Literature in the Post LeVeen Era
【24h】

Denver Peritoneovenous Shunts for the Management of Malignant Ascites: A Review of the Literature in the Post LeVeen Era

机译:丹佛腹膜静脉分流术治疗恶性腹水:勒温时代后文献综述

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Most case series describing peritoneovenous (PV) shunts for malignant ascites include both LeVeen and Denver shunts. Conclusions based on these studies are no longer clinically relevant since the LeVeen shunt has been discontinued. The purpose of this study was to identify outcomes specific to Denver shunts to establish expected results in the modern era. Case series describing PV shunts for malignant ascites between 1980 and 2008 were identified through a keyword PUBMED search. Whenever possible, results attributable to Denver shunts were abstracted and analyzed. Nineteen series describing 341 patients undergoing 353 Denver PV shunts for malignant ascites were identified. The primary indications for PV shunts were unspecified or cancers of unknown origin (40%), ovarian cancer (16%), and pancreatic cancer (8%). Primary patency averaged 87 +- 57 days. Seventy-four per cent of patients died with functioning shunts. Complications occurred in 38% of patients including occlusion (24%) and disseminated intravascular coagulation (9%). Average survival of all patients was 3.0 +- 1.7 months and shunts provided effective palliation in 75.3%. One and a half per cent of 133 patients who had autopsies were reported to have hematologic dissemination. These results are not statistically different than overall results reported for both shunts combined or LeVeen shunts alone. Studies that report combined outcomes with Denver and LeVeen shunts for malignant ascites are neither negatively, nor positively influenced by one specific shunt. Expectations following PV shunting for malignant ascites do not have to be revised because LeVeen shunts are no longer available.
机译:描述恶性腹水的腹膜腔静脉分流术的大多数病例系列包括LeVeen和Denver分流术。由于不再使用LeVeen分流器,因此基于这些研究的结论不再具有临床意义。这项研究的目的是确定特定于丹佛分流术的结果,以建立现代预期的结果。通过关键字PUBMED搜索,确定了描述1980年至2008年恶性腹水PV分流的病例系列。只要有可能,就应归纳和分析可归因于丹佛分流的结果。确定了19个系列,描述了341例因353次丹佛PV分流而进行的恶性腹水患者。 PV分流的主要适应症是未明确的或来源不明的癌症(40%),卵巢癌(16%)和胰腺癌(8%)。初级通畅时间平均为87±57天。 74%的患者死于分流功能。 38%的患者发生并发症,包括阻塞(24%)和弥散性血管内凝血(9%)。所有患者的平均生存时间为3.0±1.7个月,分流可有效缓解75.3%。据报道,在进行尸检的133名患者中,有一半有血液学播散性。这些结果与组合的分流器或单独的LeVeen分流器报告的总体结果在统计学上没有差异。报告与丹佛和勒文分流术联合治疗恶性腹水的结局既不受负面影响,也不受任何特定分流器的积极影响。由于LeVeen分流不再可用,因此不必修改PV分流恶性腹水后的预期。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号