首页> 外文期刊>The American journal on addictions / >Tramadol versus Buprenorphine for the Management of Acute Heroin Withdrawal: A Retrospective Matched Cohort Controlled Study.
【24h】

Tramadol versus Buprenorphine for the Management of Acute Heroin Withdrawal: A Retrospective Matched Cohort Controlled Study.

机译:曲马多与丁丙诺啡治疗急性海洛因戒断的研究:一项回顾性配对队列对照研究。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Many medications have been used over the past thirty years for the treatment of opioid withdrawal, including propoxyphene, methadone, clonidine, parenteral buprenorphine, and, more recently, sublingual buprenorphine. Each has been found to have clinical strengths and limitations. Tramadol is a centrally acting synthetic analgesic with opiate activity primarily due to the binding of a metabolite to the micro receptor. Despite this micro receptor activity, tramadol appears to have low abuse potential and is a non-scheduled analgesic. The pharmacologic profile of tramadol makes it a candidate for opiate withdrawal treatment. A chart review was undertaken to retrospectively compare treatment outcomes of heroin-dependent patients when detoxified with parenteral buprenorphine (1996-1997) versus tramadol (1999-2000). Inclusion criteria for this study were heroin as drug of choice, current opioid physical dependence (ie, withdrawal symptoms), no current abuse of oral opioid analgesics, and no alcohol or benzodiazepine withdrawal symptoms. Patient cases that met inclusion criteria were group-matched between buprenorphine and tramadol on the basis of age, sex, and amount of heroin used (bags/day). Charts were audited for patient demographics, daily heroin use at admission, withdrawal symptoms, and discharge status. In total, 129 patient charts were reviewed, and 115 met all inclusion criteria and were group-matched (45 patients in the buprenorphine group, seventy in the tramadol group). There were no differences in demographics between the two groups of patients. Fifty-six percent of the buprenorphine group and 71% of the tramadol group completed detoxification; tramadol-treated patients had significantly higher average withdrawal symptoms when compared to the buprenorphine group and a greater reduction in withdrawal symptoms over time. Finally, the number of side effects was small and did not differ between the groups. The results of this study are consistent with previous pilot reports that indicated few clinical differences between parenteral buprenorphine and oral tramadol protocols when used in the management of acute heroin withdrawal. As a consequence, tramadol shows some promise as an opioid withdrawal management medication.
机译:在过去的三十年中,已经使用了许多药物来治疗阿片类药物戒断,包括丙氧芬,美沙酮,可乐定,肠胃外丁丙诺啡,以及最近舌下的丁丙诺啡。已发现每种药物都有临床优势和局限性。曲马多是具有鸦片活性的中枢合成镇痛药,主要是由于代谢产物与微受体结合。尽管有这种微受体活性,曲马多似乎具有低滥用潜力并且是非计划的镇痛药。曲马多的药理作用使其成为鸦片戒断治疗的候选药物。进行了图表审查,以回顾性比较经肠胃外丁丙诺啡(1996-1997)和曲马多(1999-2000)解毒的海洛因依赖患者的治疗结果。这项研究的纳入标准包括:海洛因作为首选药物,当前的阿片类药物的身体依赖性(即戒断症状),目前没有滥用口服阿片类镇痛药以及无酒精或苯二氮卓类戒断症状。符合入选标准的患者病例根据年龄,性别和海洛因使用量(袋/天)在丁丙诺啡和曲马多之间进行组匹配。对图表进行了审计,以了解患者的人口统计资料,入院时的每日海洛因使用量,戒断症状和出院状态。总共审查了129例患者图表,其中115项符合所有纳入标准并进行了组匹配(丁丙诺啡组45例,曲马多组70例)。两组患者之间的人口统计学无差异。丁丙诺啡组的56%和曲马多组的71%完成了排毒;与丁丙诺啡组相比,接受曲马多治疗的患者的平均戒断症状明显更高,并且随着时间的推移,戒断症状的减轻程度更大。最后,副作用的数量很少,两组之间没有差异。这项研究的结果与以前的先导报告一致,后者表明在用于急性海洛因戒断治疗时,肠胃外丁丙诺啡和口服曲马多方案之间的临床差异很小。结果,曲马多显示出作为阿片类药物戒断治疗药物的前景。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号