首页> 外文期刊>Journal of opioid management >A double-blind, double-dummy, randomized controlled study of memantine versus buprenorphine in naloxone-precipitated acute withdrawal in heroin addicts.
【24h】

A double-blind, double-dummy, randomized controlled study of memantine versus buprenorphine in naloxone-precipitated acute withdrawal in heroin addicts.

机译:美金刚与丁丙诺啡在纳洛酮诱发的海洛因成瘾者急性戒断中的双盲,双虚拟,随机对照研究。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

OBJECTIVES: To compare the efficacy of memantine with buprenorphine in the suppression of naloxone-precipitated acute withdrawal in heroin-dependent male subjects in an inpatient setting. SETTING: Inpatient unit of tertiary level deaddiction facility. Participants: Forty-five treatment-seeking heroin-dependent males. INTERVENTIONS: Subjects stabilized on 650 mg of dextropropoxyphene for 5 days were randomly divided into two groups on the sixth day: group A (n=25) received 20 mg of memantine with buprenorphineplacebo, and group B (n=20) received 2 mg of buprenorphine with memantine placebo. Acute withdrawals were precipitated with naloxone (0.4 mg, intravenously) and were assessed using subjective and objective opioid withdrawal scales (SOWS and OOWS) and two separate visual analogue scales (VASs) for pain and dysphoria at baseline prior to test drug administration and again after the precipitation of acute withdrawal. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Severity ofprecipitated opioid withdrawals. RESULTS: Baseline opioid withdrawal symptoms in both groups did not differ significantly. After the precipitation of acute withdrawal, there were no significant differences between subjects in both groups on OOWS and both VASs but showed significant difference on SOWS. When changes in ratings from baseline (and after naloxone-precipitated acute withdrawal) were compared between the two groups, a significant difference in the change in SOWS scores was observed with greater decrease in withdrawal scores in the buprenorphine group. CONCLUSIONS: Memantine has comparable efficacy to buprenorphine in the suppression of objective signs of naloxone-precipitated acute opioid withdrawal; however, its role in the suppression of subjective symptoms is debatable.
机译:目的:比较美金刚和丁丙诺啡在住院患者中对海洛因依赖男性受试者抑制纳洛酮沉淀的急性戒断的疗效。单位:第三级人口停滞设施的住院单元。参与者:四十五名寻求治疗的依赖海洛因的男性。干预措施:在650 mg右丙氧吩中稳定5天的受试者在第六天随机分为两组:A组(n = 25)接受20 mg美金刚和丁丙诺啡安慰剂,B组(n = 20)接受2 mg丁丙诺啡与美金刚安慰剂。用纳洛酮(0.4 mg,静脉内)沉淀急性停药,并使用主观和客观的阿片类药物停药量表(SOWS和OOWS)以及两个单独的视觉模拟量表(VAS)评估基线水平,在试验药物给药前和给药后疼痛和烦躁不安。急性撤药的沉淀。主要观察指标:阿片类药物戒断严重。结果:两组阿片类药物戒断症状基线无明显差异。急性戒断症状消失后,两组在OOWS和两个VAS上的受试者之间均无显着差异,但在SOWS上显示出显着差异。当比较两组的基线水平(以及纳洛酮沉淀的急性停药后)的变化时,观察到SOWS评分的变化存在显着差异,丁丙诺啡组的停药分数下降幅度更大。结论:美金刚在抑制纳洛酮沉淀的急性阿片类药物戒断的客观体征方面具有与丁丙诺啡相当的功效;然而,其在抑制主观症状方面的作用尚待商.。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号