首页> 外文期刊>Psychology in the schools >Relationship of reading fluency assessment data with state accountability test scores: A longitudinal comparison of grade levels
【24h】

Relationship of reading fluency assessment data with state accountability test scores: A longitudinal comparison of grade levels

机译:阅读流畅性评估数据与州责任测试分数的关系:年级水平的纵向比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

The No Child Left Behind Act of 2001 mandated statewide accountability testing and focused the accountability conversation on reading. Therefore, the Current study examined the relationship between curriculum-based measurement for reading (R-CBM) and state accountability test scores, potential grade differences in relationship magnitude, and differences in relationship magnitude among R-CBM and Maze as they compare to state test scores. Data for 5,472 students in Grades 3, 5, 7, and 8 were correlated and resulted in corrected coefficients that ranged from .51 (eighth graders) to .71 (third graders) for R-CBM and .49 (eighth graders) to .54 (seventh graders) for Maze. The coefficients between R-CBM and state test scores were significantly larger for third and fifth graders than those for eighth graders. No significant differences in magnitude were found between the correlation coefficients for state test scores to R-CBM and to Maze among seventh or eighth graders. Potential implications and suggestions for future research are included. (c) 2006 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
机译:2001年的“不让任何一个孩子落伍”法案要求对州进行问责制测试,并将问责制对话重点放在阅读上。因此,本研究研究了基于课程的阅读测量(R-CBM)与州责任测试分数,关系等级的潜在等级差异以及R-CBM与迷宫之间的关系等级与状态测试之间的关系。分数。分别对3、5、7和8年级的5,472名学生的数据进行了关联,得出的校正系数介于R-CBM的.51(八年级学生)至.71(三年级学生)和0.49(八年级学生)至。迷宫54(七年级生)。三年级和五年级学生的R-CBM和状态测试分数之间的系数显着大于八年级学生。在七年级或八年级学生中,状态测试分数与R-CBM和迷宫的相关系数之间在大小上没有显着差异。包括对未来研究的潜在影响和建议。 (c)2006年Wiley Periodicals,Inc.

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号