首页> 外文期刊>Public health reports >Colorectal cancer screening among users of county health centers and users of private physician practices.
【24h】

Colorectal cancer screening among users of county health centers and users of private physician practices.

机译:在县级医疗中心的使用者和私人医生的使用者中进行大肠癌筛查。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

OBJECTIVE: We examined use of colorectal cancer (CRC) screening exam modalities among county health centers and private physician offices, where both were located in the same geographic area. METHODS: We surveyed 500 county health center registrants and 570 private physician patients, aged 52-75 years. We administered telephone surveys during 2004 to examine relationships among sociodemographic characteristics; perceived barriers to screening with fecal occult blood test (FOBT), sigmoidoscopy, and colonoscopy; and self-reported receipt of each exam. RESULTS: FOBT was more frequent among county health center registrants; sigmoidoscopy and colonoscopy were more frequent among private physician patients (p < 0.001). County health center registrants less frequently cited no physician recommendation as a barrier to FOBT, but more frequently cited no recommendation as a barrier to sigmoidoscopy and colonoscopy, compared with private physician patients (p < or = 0.02). Among county health center registrants, better health insurance coverage was associated with lower odds of FOBT and higher odds of screening endoscopy; perceived barriers were associated with lower odds of screening (p < 0.02). Among private physician patients, we noted an association between perceived barriers to screening and lower odds of any screening (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Overall, CRC screening among county health center and private physician patient samples compared favorably with overall New York and U.S. rates. Although prior studies using national data suggested that screening rates were equivalent in county health center and private physician primary care settings, we found exam-specific differences in patient-reported screening endoscopy among our two patient samples. Understanding factors that contribute to differences in CRC screening between primary care settings is important for ensuring equal access to CRC screening options for all patients.
机译:目的:我们研究了县卫生中心和私人医生办公室(均位于同一地理区域)之间对结肠直肠癌(CRC)筛查检查方式的使用情况。方法:我们调查了500名县医疗中心的注册人和570名年龄在52-75岁之间的私人医师。我们在2004年进行了电话调查,以研究社会人口特征之间的关系。粪便潜血试验(FOBT),乙状结肠镜检查和结肠镜检查的筛查障碍;以及每次考试的自我报告收据。结果:FOBT在县卫生中心注册者中更为频繁。乙状结肠镜检查和结肠镜检查在私人医师患者中更为常见(p <0.001)。与私人医师患者相比,县医疗中心的注册者较少引用无医师推荐作为FOBT的障碍,但更经常引用无推荐作为乙状结肠镜和结肠镜检查的障碍(p <或= 0.02)。在县卫生中心注册者中,更好的医疗保险覆盖率与较低的FOBT几率和较高的内窥镜检查几率相关;感知障碍与较低的筛查几率相关(p <0.02)。在私人医师患者中,我们注意到感知的筛查障碍与任何筛查的较低机率之间存在关联(p <0.001)。结论:总体而言,在县卫生中心和私人医生患者样本中进行CRC筛查的结果优于纽约和美国的总体比率。尽管先前使用国家数据进行的研究表明,县级卫生中心和私人医生的初级保健机构的筛查率是相同的,但我们发现在我们的两个患者样本中,患者报告的筛查内窥镜检查存在特定的检查差异。了解导致基层医疗机构之间CRC筛查差异的因素对于确保所有患者平等获得CRC筛查选项至关重要。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号