首页> 外文期刊>Bundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz >Are German information materials on colorectal cancer screening understandable or do they fail? Rating of health information by users with different educational backgrounds
【24h】

Are German information materials on colorectal cancer screening understandable or do they fail? Rating of health information by users with different educational backgrounds

机译:德国关于大肠癌筛查的信息材料是否可以理解或是否失败?具有不同教育背景的用户对健康信息的评分

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Evidence-based patient information is an essential part of decision making in health issues. A qualitative study was conducted to examine whether consumers consider the health information on colorectal cancer screening in Germany helpful in supporting their decision making. In this study, eight texts from different German authors about colorectal cancer screening were evaluated with a criteria-based selection. The texts were tested for understandability, structure, design, and effect on readers.Thirteen semi-structured focus groups were formed including 59 higher-educated and 15 lower-educated testers, 46% of them being male with a mean age of 62.9 years.The transcripts were analyzed by content-analytic assessment. The testers provided detailed comments on the content and design of the texts. They revealed inaccuracies and suggested improvements of the texts. The testers differed from each other in terms of the intensity of their participation in the discussions and comprehension of the material. The reception of the flyers and brochures varied according to the educational level of the testers. Lower-educated testers often skipped passages of texts about risks as well as passages containing numbers and graphics. The texts had different effects on the testers, regardless of the level of education. If adverse effects were pre sented, some testers became scared while others were reassured because they felt informed. Most of the testers appreciated a call for participation as a central message of the text. Sometimes, if there was no clear appeal to attend the screening, the testers even asked for it.The recently introduced political strategy of promoting an informed choice is applied to an unprepared population who was used to getting a clear yes-or-no recommendation. Thus, at first, the population has to learn how to make an informed choice. This topic must be addressed and taken into account in the process of developing health information. Since this is not always the case, we conclude that current materials are limited in their contribution toward the decision of attending CRC screening.
机译:基于证据的患者信息是健康问题决策的重要组成部分。进行了定性研究,以检验消费者是否认为德国大肠癌筛查的健康信息有助于他们的决策。在这项研究中,来自德国的不同作者的八篇有关结直肠癌筛查的文章均采用基于标准的选择进行了评估。对这些文本进行了易读性,结构,设计和对读者的影响测试。形成了13个半结构化焦点小组,包括59名受过高等教育的测试者和15名受过低教育的测试者,其中46%是男性,平均年龄为62.9岁。通过内容分析评估来分析成绩单。测试人员提供了有关文本内容和设计的详细评论。他们发现了错误之处,并建议对文本进行改进。测试人员在参与讨论和理解材料的强度方面彼此不同。传单和手册的接受程度根据测试人员的教育程度而有所不同。受过较低教育的测试人员经常跳过有关风险的文字段落以及包含数字和图形的段落。无论受教育程度如何,文本对测试人员的影响都不同。如果出现不良反应,则某些测试人员会感到害怕,而其他测试人员则因为感到有见识而放心。大多数测试人员赞赏将参与作为文本的中心信息的呼吁。有时,如果没有明确的呼吁参加检查,测试人员甚至会要求这样做。最近引入的促进知情选择的政治策略适用于习惯于获得明确的“是或否”建议的无准备的人群。因此,首先,人群必须学习如何做出明智的选择。在开发健康信息的过程中必须解决并考虑到该主题。由于并非总是如此,因此我们得出结论,当前材料对参加CRC筛查的决定的贡献有限。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号