首页> 外文期刊>Physiotherapy >The Chelsea Critical Care Physical Assessment Tool (CPAx): Validation of an innovative new tool to measure physical morbidity in the general adult critical care population; An observational proof-of-concept pilot study
【24h】

The Chelsea Critical Care Physical Assessment Tool (CPAx): Validation of an innovative new tool to measure physical morbidity in the general adult critical care population; An observational proof-of-concept pilot study

机译:切尔西重症监护身体评估工具(CPAx):验证了一种新颖的新工具,该工具可以测量一般成人重症监护人群的身体发病率;观察性概念验证试点研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Objective: To develop a scoring system to measure physical morbidity in critical care - the Chelsea Critical Care Physical Assessment Tool (CPAx). Method: The development process was iterative involving content validity indices (CVI), a focus group and an observational study of 33 patients to test construct validity against the Medical Research Council score for muscle strength, peak cough flow, Australian Therapy Outcome Measures score, Glasgow Coma Scale score, Bloomsbury sedation score, Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score, Short Form 36 (SF-36) score, days of mechanical ventilation and inter-rater reliability. Participants: Trauma and general critical care patients from two London teaching hospitals. Results: Users of the CPAx felt that it possessed content validity, giving a final CVI of 1.00 (. P<. 0.05). Construct validation data showed moderate to strong significant correlations between the CPAx score and all secondary measures, apart from the mental component of the SF-36 which demonstrated weak correlation with the CPAx score (. r=. 0.024, P=. 0.720). Reliability testing showed internal consistency of ??=. 0.798 and inter-rater reliability of ??=. 0.988 (95% confidence interval 0.791 to 1.000) between five raters. Conclusion: This pilot work supports proof of concept of the CPAx as a measure of physical morbidity in the critical care population, and is a cogent argument for further investigation of the scoring system. ? 2012 Chartered Society of Physiotherapy.
机译:目的:开发切尔西重症监护物理评估工具(CPAx),以评估重症监护中身体疾病的评分系统。方法:开发过程是反复进行的,涉及内容有效性指数(CVI),一个焦点小组和一项针对33名患者的观察性研究,以针对医学研究委员会的肌肉强度,峰值咳嗽流量,澳大利亚治疗结果指标得分,格拉斯哥得分对结构有效性进行测试昏迷量表评分,布卢姆斯伯里镇静评分,顺序器官衰竭评估评分,简短表格36(SF-36)评分,机械通气天数和评估者间可靠性。参加者:来自伦敦两家教学医院的创伤和一般重症监护患者。结果:CPAx的用户认为它具有内容有效性,最终CVI为1.00(。P <。0.05)。构造验证数据显示,除了SF-36的心理成分与CPAx评分之间的相关性较弱外,CPAx评分与所有辅助措施之间的相关性中等至很强(r = 0.024,P = 0.720)。可靠性测试表明内部一致性为。 0.798,评估者间可靠性为。五个评估者之间的关系为0.988(95%置信区间0.791至1.000)。结论:这项试点工作支持CPAx概念的验证,作为衡量重症监护人群中身体发病率的指标,并且是进一步评估评分系统的有力论据。 ? 2012年英国物理治疗学会。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号