首页> 外文期刊>Visual Cognition >Colour language and colour cognition: Brown and Lenneberg revisited
【24h】

Colour language and colour cognition: Brown and Lenneberg revisited

机译:颜色语言和颜色认知:重新审视了Brown和Lenneberg

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

We report two experiments that revisit the question raised by Brown and Lenneberg (1954) concerning the degree to which colours that are easier to name are also easier to communicate and to remember. Much subsequent research has suggested that such effects depend on context and task demands. In the present experiments communication accuracy and recognition memory were compared, varying the distractor array for items that are either best examples (focal) of the eight basic chromatic categories named in English, or peripheral (nonfocal) examples of them. Focal targets were communicated faster, more accurately, and with fewer words than nonfocal targets, irrespective of array. However, they were not recognized more accurately under all conditions. With a randomized array of distractors, more akin to real scenes outside the lab, there was no recognition advantage for those colours that are easiest to code and communicate. We conclude that focal colours are not inherently more memorable.
机译:我们报告了两个实验,这些实验重新审视了Brown和Lenneberg(1954)提出的关于更易于命名的颜色也更易于传达和记住的程度的问题。随后的许多研究表明,这种影响取决于上下文和任务要求。在本实验中,对通信准确性和识别记忆进行了比较,改变了分散器阵列的项目,这些项目要么是用英语命名的八个基本色度类别的最佳示例(焦点),要么是它们的外围(非焦点)示例。与非重点目标相比,重点目标的通信速度更快,更准确,并且用更少的词,而与数组无关。但是,在所有情况下都无法更准确地识别它们。有了分散的干扰物阵列(更类似于实验室外的真实场景),那些最容易编码和交流的颜色就没有识别优势。我们得出的结论是,焦点色并不是天生就更让人难忘。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Visual Cognition》 |2009年第3期|412-430|共19页
  • 作者单位

    Department of General Psychology, University of Padova, Padova, Italy;

    Department of Psychology, University of Essex, Colchester, UK;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号