首页> 外文期刊>User modeling and user-adapted interaction >Evaluating the effectiveness of explanations for recommender systems Methodological issues and empirical studies on the impact of personalization
【24h】

Evaluating the effectiveness of explanations for recommender systems Methodological issues and empirical studies on the impact of personalization

机译:评估推荐系统解释的有效性关于个性化影响的方法论问题和实证研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

When recommender systems present items, these can be accompanied by explanatory information. Such explanations can serve seven aims: effectiveness, satisfaction, transparency, scrutability, trust, persuasiveness, and efficiency. These aims can be incompatible, so any evaluation needs to state which aim is being investigated and use appropriate metrics. This paper focuses particularly on effectiveness (helping users to make good decisions) and its trade-off with satisfaction. It provides an overview of existing work on evaluating effectiveness and the metrics used. It also highlights the limitations of the existing effectiveness metrics, in particular the effects of under- and overestimation and recommendation domain. In addition to this methodological contribution, the paper presents four empirical studies in two domains: movies and cameras. These studies investigate the impact of personalizing simple feature-based explanations on effectiveness and satisfaction. Both approximated and real effectiveness is investigated. Contrary to expectation, personalization was detrimental to effectiveness, though it may improve user satisfaction. The studies also highlighted the importance of considering opt-out rates and the underlying rating distribution when evaluating effectiveness.
机译:当推荐系统显示项目时,这些项目可以附带解释性信息。这样的解释可以达到七个目的:有效性,满意度,透明性,可理解性,信任,说服力和效率。这些目标可能不兼容,因此任何评估都必须说明正在调查哪个目标并使用适当的度量。本文特别关注有效性(帮助用户做出正确的决策)及其令人满意的折衷方案。它概述了有关评估有效性和使用的度量标准的现有工作。它还强调了现有有效性指标的局限性,尤其是低估和高估以及推荐域的影响。除了这种方法上的贡献外,本文还提出了两个领域的四个实证研究:电影和照相机。这些研究调查了个性化基于功能的简单说明对有效性和满意度的影响。研究了近似有效性和实际有效性。与期望相反,个性化虽然会提高用户满意度,但对有效性有害。这些研究还强调了在评估有效性时考虑退出率和基本评级分布的重要性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号