首页> 外文期刊>Transactions of the ASABE >ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS OF APPLYING COMPOSTED ORGANICS TO NEW HIGHWAY EMBANKMENTS: PART 1. INTERRILL RUNOFF AND EROSION
【24h】

ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS OF APPLYING COMPOSTED ORGANICS TO NEW HIGHWAY EMBANKMENTS: PART 1. INTERRILL RUNOFF AND EROSION

机译:将混合有机物应用于新的高速公路路堤的环境影响:第1部分。径流径流和侵蚀

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Construction of new highways can lead to challenges when attempting to re-establish vegetation on right-of-ways. Lack of vegetation can leave soil exposed and subject to increased runoff and soil erosion. Therefore, the Iowa Department of Transportation and the Iowa Department of Natural Resources sponsored a study to evaluate the use of composts applied as mulch blankets to decrease runoff and erosion. This article evaluates interrill runoff and erosion between three types of compost (biosolids, yard waste, and bio-industrial byproducts) and two soil conditions (existing compacted subsoil (control) and imported topsoil) on a 3:1 highway embankment. Composts were applied as 5 and 10 cm blankets on the surface of the control, and topsoil was placed on the surface of the control at a depth of 15 cm. Treatments were replicated six times over a two-year period for both bare soil and six weeks following planting of an Iowa DOT-specified cover crop. Rainfall was applied at an average intensity of 95 mm h -1 using a rainfall simulator, and sampling was conducted for 1 h after runoff began. All compost treatments were effective at reducing interrill erosion rates under the conditions simulated in this study. In addition, the three compost media required 30 min or longer to produce runoff, while the two conventional soils produced runoff within the first 8 min. The depth of compost application was only a factor for the runoff rate on unvegetated treatments. In this case, the 5 cm depth had a significantly greater runoff rate than the 10 cm depth. Both 5 and 10 cm compost applications had similar effects on interrill erosion rates. Although the steady-state interrill erosion rates of all three composts were 3% to 24% of the steady-state interrill erosion rates of the two soils on unvegetated treatments, and 0.1% to 30% of the steady-state interrill erosion rates of the two soils on vegetated treatments, the type of compost was also a factor in interrill erosion control. The yard waste compost was the coarsest of the three compost materials, and on unvegetated plots had a steady-state interrill erosion rate that was 17% and 33% of the steady-state interrill erosion rates of biosolids and bio-industrial compost, respectively. Interrill erodibility factors were calculated for all treatments and fell within the range of experimental rangeland values (10,000 to 2,000,000 kg sec/m 4 ) that are used in the Water Erosion Prediction Project
机译:尝试在路权上重建植被时,新公路的建设可能会带来挑战。缺乏植被会使土壤裸露,径流增加和土壤侵蚀增加。因此,爱荷华州交通运输部和爱荷华州自然资源部发起了一项研究,以评估堆肥作为覆盖覆盖物的使用,以减少径流和侵蚀。本文评估了3:1高速公路路堤上三种堆肥(生物固体,院子废物和生物工业副产品)与两种土壤条件(现有压实土(对照)和进口表土)之间的钻进径流和侵蚀。将堆肥以5cm和10cm的毯子形式施加在对照的表面上,并且将表土置于15cm的深度的对照的表面上。在爱荷华州DOT指定的覆盖作物种植后的两年内,在裸土上和六周内重复处理六次。使用降雨模拟器以95 mm h -1 的平均强度进行降雨,径流开始后进行1 h采样。在本研究模拟的条件下,所有堆肥处理均能有效降低钻孔间侵蚀率。另外,三种堆肥介质需要30分钟或更长时间才能产生径流,而两种常规土壤在最初的8分钟内产生径流。堆肥施用的深度只是无植被处理的径流率的一个因素。在这种情况下,5厘米深度比10厘米深度具有更大的径流率。 5 cm和10 cm堆肥的施用对钻孔间侵蚀速率具有相似的影响。尽管所有三种堆肥的稳态间钻蚀率分别是未经土壤处理的两种土壤的稳态间钻蚀率的3%至24%,以及非土壤处理中两种土壤的稳态间钻蚀率的0.1%至30%。在两种土壤上进行植被处理后,堆肥的类型也是控制间蚀的一个因素。堆场废料堆肥是三种堆肥材料中最粗的,在无植被的土地上,其稳态间钻蚀率分别为生物固体和生物工业堆肥的稳态间钻蚀率的17%和33%。计算了所有处理的钻头间侵蚀度因子,这些因子落在水蚀预测项目中使用的实验牧场值范围(10,000至2,000,000 kg sec / m 4 )的范围内

著录项

  • 来源
    《Transactions of the ASABE》 |2004年第2期|p.463-469|共7页
  • 作者单位

    do not necessarily reflect the views of IDNR. The authors are Russell A. Persyn, ASAE Member Engineer, Assistant Professor and Extension Specialist, Department of Biological and Agricultural Engineering. Texas A&

    M University, College Station, Texas;

    Thomas D. Glanville, ASAE Member Engineer, Associate Professor, Tom L. Richard, ASAE Member Engineer, Associate Professor, and John M. Laflen, ASAE Fellow Engineer, Adjunct Professor, Department of Agricultural and Biosystems Engineering, Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa;

    and Philip M. Dixon, Professor, Department of Statistics, Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa. Corresponding author: Russell Persyn, Department of Biological and Agricultural Engineering, Texas A&

    M University, 2117 TAMU, 306A Scoates Hall, College Station, TX 77843-2117;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

    Compost; Construction; Erodibility; Erosion; Interrill; Runoff;

    机译:堆肥;施工;可蚀性侵蚀;Interrill;径流;

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号