首页> 外文期刊>Technological forecasting and social change >Going beyond definitions to understand tensions within the bioeconomy: The contribution of sociotechnical regimes to contested fields
【24h】

Going beyond definitions to understand tensions within the bioeconomy: The contribution of sociotechnical regimes to contested fields

机译:超越定义,以了解生物经济内的紧张局势:社会科技制度对竞争领域的贡献

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The bioeconomy is steadily becoming more important to regional, national and European public policy. As it encompasses the transformation of agricultural, marine and organic resources into food, feed, fuels, energy and materials, the bioeconomy should become a major new industry replacing oil-based products. However, policymakers take two main approaches to developing the bioeconomy. The first, biotech-oriented approach depicts the bioeconomy as a biotechnology subsector. The second, biomass-oriented approach (i) considers biomass transformation as its starting point, (ii) raises the issue of bioeconomy sustainability, and (iii) considers biotechnology as just one of many transformation technologies. The growing literature on defining the bioeconomy has not yet covered the articulation between biotechnology and bioeconomy. This paper fills this critical gap and provides policy recommendations depending on whether the goal is to develop biotechnology or to contribute to green growth and sustainability.
机译:生物经济稳步变得对区域,国家和欧洲公共政策更为重要。由于它包括农业,海洋和有机资源的转变为食品,饲料,燃料,能源和材料,生物经济应该成为一家替代石油产品的主要产业。然而,政策制定者采取两种主要方法来发展生物经济。首先,生物技术为导向的方法描绘了生物经济作为生物技术局长。第二种生物量的方法(i)认为生物量转变为其起点,(ii)提出了生物经济可持续性的问题,(iii)认为生物技术只有许多转型技术之一。在定义生物经济学的日益增长的文献尚未涵盖生物技术与生物经济之间的阐述。本文填补了这一关键差距,并根据目标是制定生物技术还是有助于绿色增长和可持续性,提供政策建议。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号