首页> 外文期刊>Social science computer review >Assessing Replicability of Machine Learning Results: An Introduction to Methods on Predictive Accuracy in Social Sciences
【24h】

Assessing Replicability of Machine Learning Results: An Introduction to Methods on Predictive Accuracy in Social Sciences

机译:评估机器学习结果的可复制性:对社会科学预测准确性的方法介绍

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Machine learning methods have become very popular in diverse fields due to their focus on predictive accuracy, but little work has been conducted on how to assess the replicability of their findings. We introduce and adapt replication methods advocated in psychology to the aims and procedural needs of machine learning research. In Study 1, we illustrate these methods with the use of an empirical data set, assessing the replication success of a predictive accuracy measure, namely, R ~(2)on the cross-validated and test sets of the samples. We introduce three replication aims. First, tests of inconsistency examine whether single replications have successfully rejected the original study. Rejection will be supported if the 95% confidence interval (CI) of R ~(2)difference estimates between replication and original does not contain zero. Second, tests of consistency help support claims of successful replication. We can decide apriori on a region of equivalence, where population values of the difference estimates are considered equivalent for substantive reasons. The 90% CI of a different estimate lying fully within this region supports replication. Third, we show how to combine replications to construct meta-analytic intervals for better precision of predictive accuracy measures. In Study 2, R ~(2)is reduced from the original in a subset of replication studies to examine the ability of the replication procedures to distinguish true replications from nonreplications. We find that when combining studies sampled from same population to form meta-analytic intervals, random-effects methods perform best for cross-validated measures while fixed-effects methods work best for test measures. Among machine learning methods, regression was comparable to many complex methods, while support vector machine performed most reliably across a variety of scenarios. Social scientists who use machine learning to model empirical data can use these methods to enhance the reliability of their findings.
机译:由于他们专注于预测准确性,机器学习方法在不同领域变得非常流行,但如何对如何评估其调查结果的可复制性进行了很少的工作。我们介绍和调整在心理学中提出的复制方法,以实现机器学习研究的目标和程序需求。在研究1中,我们通过使用经验数据集来说明这些方法,评估了预测精度测量的复制成功,即样本交叉验证和测试集的R〜(2)。我们介绍了三个复制目标。首先,不一致的测试检查单一复制是否已成功拒绝原始研究。如果R〜(2)差异估计的95%置信区间(CI)之间的复制与原件之间的差异估计不包含零,则将支持拒绝。其次,一致性的测试有助于支持成功复制的索赔。我们可以在等价地区决定Apriori,其中差异估计的人口价值观被认为是等同于实质性原因。在该区域内完全估计的90%CI完全估计支持复制。三,我们展示了如何结合复制来构建元分析间隔,以更好地精确预测精度措施。在研究2中,R〜(2)从原始复制研究的子集中减少,以检查复制程序区分真实复制的能力。我们发现,当与相同人群采样的研究相结合形成元分析间隔时,随机效应方法最适合交叉验证措施,而固定效果方法最适合测试措施。在机器学习方法中,回归与许多复杂方法相当,而支持向量机在各种场景中最可靠地执行。使用机器学习模拟实证数据的社会科学家可以使用这些方法来提高他们发现的可靠性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号