...
首页> 外文期刊>Sea history >A New Look at Nathaniel Bowditch, Nineteenth-Century America's Numbers Man
【24h】

A New Look at Nathaniel Bowditch, Nineteenth-Century America's Numbers Man

机译:纳撒尼尔·鲍迪奇(Nathaniel Bowditch)的新面貌,十九世纪的美国数字人

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

If there is one reason that Nathaniel Bowditch's New American Practical Navigator, first published in 1802, became the standard American maritime manual, it was the accuracy of its navigational tables. Yes, as a replacement for the old standby, Englishman John Hamilton Moore's New Practical Navigator, Bowditch's work held patriotic appeal. And it was true enough that Bowditch's Navigator was clearer and better organized than Moore's, even if most of the text was essentially the same. But it was the numbers that sold American mariners on Bowditch. The unprecedentedly reliable tables, keyed to the mathematically regular movements of heavenly bodies, allowed mariners to establish their position at sea with certainty. Bowditch didn't create these numbers, of course, as they were based on the universals of mathematics and astronomy, as were Moore's. But, being a numbers man, Bowditch reworked tens of thousands of calculations and discovered no fewer than 8,000 errors in Moore's published tables. Despite the fact that it had been the most popular navigational text since it was first published in 1772, it was no secret that Moore's numbers couldn't be trusted; in 1791, Thomas Jefferson wrote that "the later edns. are so incorrect as to be worth nothing."1 In welcome contrast, you could stake your life on the accuracy of Bowditch's numbers. Many mariners did, and they-and their cargoes-made it to their destinations safely.
机译:如果有理由说纳撒尼尔·鲍迪奇(Nathaniel Bowditch)于1802年首次出版的《新美国实用航海家》成为标准的美国海事手册,那是其导航表的准确性。是的,作为英国人约翰·汉密尔顿·摩尔(John Hamilton Moore)的《新实用航海家》(New Practical Navigator)的替代品,鲍迪奇的作品具有爱国主义的吸引力。而且,即使大部分文字基本相同,鲍迪奇的导航器也比摩尔的导航器更清晰,井井有条,这的确是事实。但这是在Bowditch上出售美国水手的人数。前所未有的可靠桌子,以天体的数学规律运动为关键,使水手能够确定地在海上确立自己的位置。当然,鲍迪奇并没有创造这些数字,因为它们是基于数学和天文学的通用性,就像摩尔的基于。但是,作为一名数字专家,鲍迪奇进行了数以万计的计算,并在摩尔的已发布表格中发现了不少于8,000个错误。尽管自从1772年首次出版以来,它一直是最受欢迎的导航文本,但穆尔的数字是不可信赖的,这已经不是什么秘密了。 1791年,托马斯·杰斐逊(Thomas Jefferson)写道:“后来的版本太不正确了,以至于一文不值。” 1与此形成鲜明对比的是,您可以将自己的生命投向鲍迪奇数字的准确性。许多水手做到了,他们和他们的货物安全地将其运到了目的地。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号