...
首页> 外文期刊>Research in science & technological education >Experimental comparison of inquiry and direct instruction in science
【24h】

Experimental comparison of inquiry and direct instruction in science

机译:科学探究与直接指导的实验比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

There are continuing educational and political debates about 'inquiry' versus 'direct' teaching of science. Traditional science instruction has been largely direct but in the US, recent national and state science education standards advocate inquiry throughout K-12 education. While inquiry-based instruction has the advantage of modelling aspects of the nature of real scientific inquiry, there is little unconfounded comparative research into the effectiveness and efficiency of the two instructional modes for developing science conceptual understanding. This research undertook a controlled experimental study comparing the efficacy of carefully designed inquiry instruction and equally carefully designed direct instruction in realistic science classroom situations at the middle school grades. The research design addressed common threats to validity. We report on the nature of the instructional units in each mode, research design, methods, classroom implementations, monitoring, assessments, analysis and project findings.
机译:关于“探究”与“直接”科学教学的教育和政治辩论仍在继续。传统科学教学在很大程度上是直接的,但在美国,最近的国家和州科学教育标准主张在整个K-12教育中进行探究。尽管基于探究的教学具有对真实科学探究的本质进行建模的优势,但很少有人对这两种教学模式发展科学概念理解的有效性和效率进行比较研究。这项研究进行了一项对照实验研究,比较了精心设计的探究教学和同样精心设计的直接教学在初中阶段实际科学课堂中的功效。研究设计解决了对有效性的常见威胁。我们报告每种模式中教学单元的性质,研究设计,方法,课堂实施,监控,评估,分析和项目发现。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号