首页> 外文期刊>Reliability Engineering & System Safety >Comparison of techniques for modeling accident progression in dynamic aerospace applications with and without repair
【24h】

Comparison of techniques for modeling accident progression in dynamic aerospace applications with and without repair

机译:具有和不具有修复功能的动态航空航天应用中事故进展建模技术的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

This paper discusses the use of the multiple event tree and single event tree approaches in Probabilistic Risk Assessments for aerospace applications. The issue is how repair can affect the modeling. Four simple examples are presented to show how even a seemingly simple system can become a complex PRA model if the less than optimum approach is used. In cases of repair, it is suggested that the multiple event tree approach is the more appropriate model. In cases of no repair, it is suggested that the single event tree approach is the easier PRA modeling solution.
机译:本文讨论了在航空航天应用概率风险评估中使用多事件树和单事件树方法。问题是修复如何影响建模。给出了四个简单的示例,以说明如果使用的不是最佳方法,哪怕看似简单的系统也可以变成复杂的PRA模型。在维修的情况下,建议使用多事件树方法是更合适的模型。在无法修复的情况下,建议单事件树方法是更容易的PRA建模解决方案。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号