首页> 外文期刊>Psychology & Health >Do sedentary motives adversely affect physical activity? Adding cross-behavioural cognitions to the theory of planned behaviour
【24h】

Do sedentary motives adversely affect physical activity? Adding cross-behavioural cognitions to the theory of planned behaviour

机译:久坐的动机会对运动产生不利影响吗?在计划行为理论中增加跨行为认知

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

The purpose of this study was to explore whether sedentary behavior cognitions explain physical activity (PA) intention and behavior when integrated within the theory of planned behavior framework (TPB). A random community sample of 206 adults and a sample of 174 undergraduate students completed measures of the TPB pertaining to PA and four popular leisure-time behaviors (TV viewing, computer use, sedentary hobbies, and sedentary socializing) and an adapted Godin Leisure-Time Exercize Questionnaire (community sample = cross-sectional, undergraduate sample = 2-week prospective). Results using ordinary least squares regression provided evidence that TV viewing intention explains additional variance in PA behavior, and affective attitude (community sample) and perceived behavioral control (undergraduate sample) towards TV viewing explains additional variance in PA intention even after controlling for PA-related TPB constructs. These results underscore the potential value of adding sedentary control interventions in concert with PA promotion.
机译:这项研究的目的是探讨久坐行为认知是否能将身体活动(PA)的意图和行为解释为计划行为框架(TPB)的理论。随机抽取206名成年人的社区样本和174名大学生的样本,完成了有关PA和4种流行的休闲时间行为(电视观看,计算机使用,久坐的嗜好和久坐的社交活动)的城规会的测量,以及经过改编的Godin休闲时间进行问卷调查(社区样本=横断面,本科样本= 2周前瞻性调查)。使用普通最小二乘回归的结果提供了证据,表明电视收看意图可以解释PA行为的其他差异,即使在控制了与PA相关的因素后,对电视观看的情感态度(社区样本)和感知的行为控制(大学生样本)也可以解释PA意图的其他差异TPB构建体。这些结果强调了与PA促进相结合增加久坐控制干预措施的潜在价值。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号