首页> 外文期刊>British journal of health psychology >Theory of planned behaviour cognitions do not predict self-reported or objective physical activity levels or change in the ProActive trial
【24h】

Theory of planned behaviour cognitions do not predict self-reported or objective physical activity levels or change in the ProActive trial

机译:计划的行为认知理论不能预测自我报告的或客观的身体活动水平或ProActive试验的变化

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Objective. The objective was to test, in a trial cohort of sedentary adults at risk of Type 2 diabetes, whether theory of planned behaviour (TPB) cognitions about becoming more physically active predicted objective and self-reported activity levels and change. Design. Participants of a randomized controlled trial underwent measurement at baseline, 6 and 12 months. Methods. Participants (N= 365, 30-50 years) were recruited via their parent or family history registers at 20 general practices in the UK. Energy expenditure was measured objectively at baseline and 1 year. Participants completed questionnaires assessing physical activity and beliefs about becoming more physically active over the next year at baseline, 6 and 12 months. Results. Between baseline and 12 months, objective energy expenditure in the cohort increased by an average of 20 minutes of brisk walking per day. Based on the 252 participants who provided complete data, affective attitude and perceived behavioural control consistently predicted intention, but intention and perceived behavioural control failed to predict physical activity levels or change (p-values >.05). Conclusions. Failure of the theory to predict behaviour and behaviour change may be due to inapplicability of the theory to this at-risk population or to trial participation and intensive measurement facilitating behaviour change without affecting measured cognitions, or lack of correspondence between cognitive and behavioural measures. A wide range of potential personal and environmental mediators should be considered when designing physical activity interventions among at-risk groups. High-quality experimental tests of the theory are needed in clinical populations.
机译:目的。目的是在一组患有2型糖尿病风险的久坐久坐的成年人的试验队列中,测试计划行为理论(TPB)对提高身体活动性的认知是否预测了目标和自我报告的活动水平及变化。设计。随机对照试验的参与者在基线,6和12个月时进行了测量。方法。参与者(N = 365,30至50岁)是通过其父母或家族史登记册在英国的20种常规做法中招募的。在基线和1年时客观地测量了能量消耗。参与者完成了问卷调查,评估了身体活动以及对明年在基线,6个月和12个月内变得更加运动的信念。结果。在基线到12个月之间,该队列中的客观能量消耗平均每天快走20分钟。根据提供完整数据的252名参与者,情感态度和感知的行为控制一致地预测了意图,但是意图和感知的行为控制未能预测身体活动水平或变化(p值> 0.05)。结论该理论无法预测行为和行为变化可能是由于该理论不适用于该高风险人群,或者是由于试验参与和强化测量以促进行为变化而又不影响所测得的认知或认知与行为测量之间缺乏对应关系。在设计高风险人群之间的体育锻炼干预措施时,应考虑广泛的潜在个人和环境调解员。在临床人群中需要对该理论进行高质量的实验测试。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号