首页> 外文期刊>Optical Switching and Networking >On discrete-time modeling of the filtered and symbol-rate sampled continuous-time signal affected by Wiener phase noise
【24h】

On discrete-time modeling of the filtered and symbol-rate sampled continuous-time signal affected by Wiener phase noise

机译:受维纳相位噪声影响的滤波后的符号率采样连续时间信号的离散时间建模

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

This paper investigates the differences between the symbol-spaced discrete-time Wiener phase noise channel model, commonly assumed in the literature to represent the effect of phase noise, and that obtained by symbol-rate sampling the filtered continuous-time received signal affected by continuous-time Wiener phase-noise. In particular, for comparison, we consider some statistical tests to check temporal and distributional properties of the two models. We show that the fit between the two models is very good even for quite strong values of phase noise. The main result is that when the standard deviation of the discrete-time Wiener phase noise increment sigma(PN) is below a threshold of approximately (sigma) over bar (PN) similar or equal to 0.1 rad, the discrete-time Wiener model provides a good approximation to the actual symbol-spaced sampled filtered signal affected by continuous-time Wiener phase noise. We show that when sigma(PN) is below (sigma) over bar (PN) the ratio between the power of the signal and the power of the model mismatch is greater than 20 dB. Simulation results are also presented to compare bit error rates of the two models in case of QPSK and 16-QAM transmission and to compare the power spectral densities of their associated complex exponential phase noises. Our results suggest that the discrete-time Wiener phase noise model can be adopted for many real-world systems, where, according to experimental results available in the literature, sigma(PN) in the order of 0.1 rad is rarely found even when the nonlinearity of the optical channel is deeply stressed. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
机译:本文研究了符号间隔离散维纳相位噪声信道模型之间的差异,该模型在文献中通常被假定为代表相位噪声的影响,并且该差异是通过符号率采样滤波后的连续时间接收到的受连续信号影响的信号而获得的。时维纳相位噪声。特别是,为了进行比较,我们考虑了一些统计检验来检查两个模型的时间和分布特性。我们表明,即使对于相当强的相位噪声值,两个模型之间的拟合也非常好。主要结果是,当离散时间维纳相位噪声增量sigma(PN)的标准偏差在接近或等于0.1 rad的bar(PN)的阈值以下时,离散时间维纳模型提供了受到连续时间维纳相位噪声影响的实际符号间隔采样滤波信号的良好近似。我们表明,当sigma(PN)低于bar(PN)时,信号功率与模型失配功率之间的比大于20 dB。还提供了仿真结果,以比较两种模型在QPSK和16-QAM传输情况下的误码率,并比较其相关的复指数相位噪声的功率谱密度。我们的结果表明,离散时间维纳相位噪声模型可用于许多实际系统,根据文献中的实验结果,即使在非线性情况下,也很少发现sigma(PN)约为0.1 rad。光通道的深度受到很大的压力。 (C)2015 Elsevier B.V.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号