首页> 外文期刊>Nuclear instruments and methods in physics research >Comparison Of Iodine K-edge Subtraction And Fluorescence Subtraction Imaging In An Animal System
【24h】

Comparison Of Iodine K-edge Subtraction And Fluorescence Subtraction Imaging In An Animal System

机译:动物系统中碘K边缘减影和荧光减影成像的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

K-Edge Subtraction (KES) utilizes the discontinuity in the X-ray absorption across the absorption edge of the selected contrast element and creates an image of the projected density of the contrast element from two images acquired just above and below the K-edge of the contrast element. KES has proved to be powerful in coronary angiography, micro-angiography, bronchography, and lymphatic imaging. X-ray fluorescence imaging is a successful technique for the detection of dilute quantities of elements in specimens. However, its application at high X-ray energies (e.g. at the iodine K-edge) is complicated by significant Compton background, which may enter the energy window set for the contrast material's fluorescent X-rays. Inspired by KES, Fluorescence Subtraction Imaging (FSI) is a technique for high-energy (>20keV) fluorescence imaging using two different incident beam energies just above and below the absorption edge of a contrast element (e.g. iodine). The below-edge image can be assumed as a "background" image, which includes Compton scatter and fluorescence from other elements. The above-edge image will contain nearly identical spectral content as the below-edge image but will contain the additional fluorescence of the contrast element. This imaging method is especially promising with thick objects with dilute contrast materials, significant Compton background, and/or competing fluorescence lines from other materials. A quality factor is developed to facilitate the comparison. The theoretical value of the quality factor sets the upper limit that an imaging method can achieve when the noise is Poisson limited. The measured value of this factor makes two or more imaging methods comparable. Using the Hard X-ray Micro-Analysis (HXMA) beamline at the Canadian Light Source (CLS), the techniques of FSI and KES were critically compared, with reference to radiation dose, image acquisition time, resolution, signal-to-noise ratios, and quality factor.
机译:K边缘减法(KES)利用所选对比元素的吸收边缘上X射线吸收的不连续性,并从刚好在K边缘的上方和下方获取的两个图像中创建对比元素投影密度的图像。对比元素。事实证明,KES在冠状动脉造影,微血管造影,支气管造影和淋巴成像方面具有强大的功能。 X射线荧光成像是一种检测标本中微量元素的成功技术。但是,由于康普顿背景的影响,使它在高X射线能量(例如碘K边缘)上的应用变得复杂,这可能会进入为对比材料的荧光X射线设定的能量窗口。受KES启发,荧光减影成像(FSI)是一种高能量(> 20keV)荧光成像技术,它使用两种不同的入射光束能量恰好位于对比元素(例如碘)吸收边缘的上方和下方。边缘以下的图像可以假定为“背景”图像,其中包括康普顿散射和其他元素发出的荧光。上边缘图像将包含与下边缘图像几乎相同的光谱含量,但将包含对比元素的附加荧光。这种成像方法尤其适用于具有稀疏对比材料,浓厚康普顿背景和/或其他材料竞争荧光线的厚物体。制定了质量因子以促进比较。品质因数的理论值设定了当噪声受到泊松限制时成像方法可以达到的上限。该因子的测量值使两种或多种成像方法具有可比性。使用加拿大光源(CLS)的硬X射线微分析(HXMA)光束线,对FSI和KES的技术进行了严格的比较,涉及辐射剂量,图像采集时间,分辨率,信噪比,以及品质因数。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号