...
首页> 外文期刊>Meat Science >Replacing starch in beef emulsion models with β-glucan, microcrystalline cellulose, or a combination of β-glucan and microcrystalline cellulose
【24h】

Replacing starch in beef emulsion models with β-glucan, microcrystalline cellulose, or a combination of β-glucan and microcrystalline cellulose

机译:用β-葡聚糖,微晶纤维素或β-葡聚糖和微晶纤维素的组合代替牛肉乳液模型中的淀粉

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Barley sourced beta-glucan (beta G), microcrystalline cellulose (MCC), or starch were added to beef emulsions containing beef, olive oil, salts, and water. Emulsions with inclusion levels of 1% of beta G, MCC, or starch, 2% of beta G, MCC, or starch, or 3% of beta G, MCC, or starch, and a mixture of beta G (1.5%) and MCC (1.5%) were evaluated for proximate composition, cooking loss, instrumental color, and texture profile analyses (WA) in three independent replications. As expected, proximate composition differed based mainly on the hydrocolloid used and formulation. Cooking loss was not different among treatments. However, WA differed with beta G samples having lower (P .05) values for hardness, adhesiveness, cohesiveness, gumminess, and chewiness compared with MCC and starch samples, while samples prepared with MCC and starch presented similar WA. Emulsions prepared with beta G had greater (P .05) b(star) values before cooking when compared with emulsions prepared with MCC and starch, but these differences were not observed in cooked emulsions.
机译:将大麦来源的β-葡聚糖(βG),微晶纤维素(MCC)或淀粉添加到包含牛肉,橄榄油,盐和水的牛肉乳液中。包含1%βG,MCC或淀粉,2%βG,MCC或淀粉,或3%βG,MCC或淀粉,以及βG(1.5%)和对MCC(1.5%)进行了三个独立的重复试验,以评估其接近的成分,蒸煮损失,仪器颜色和质地分布分析(WA)。不出所料,主要成分基于使用的水胶体和配方而有所不同。各处理之间的烹饪损失没有差异。但是,WA与硬度,粘合性,内聚性,胶粘性和耐嚼性较低(P <0.05)的βG样品相比,MCC和淀粉样品有所不同,而用MCC和淀粉制备的样品表现出相似的WA。与用MCC和淀粉制成的乳液相比,用βG制成的乳液在烹煮前具有更大的(P <.05)b(star)值,但在煮熟的乳液中未观察到这些差异。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号