首页> 外文期刊>Long Range Planning >Experiencing the paradox of coopetition: A moderated mediation framework explaining the paradoxical tension-performance relationship
【24h】

Experiencing the paradox of coopetition: A moderated mediation framework explaining the paradoxical tension-performance relationship

机译:体验合作竞争的悖论:一个适度的调解框架,解释矛盾的张力与绩效之间的关系

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

In this paper, I investigate how and why experienced paradoxical tension deteriorates coopetitive performance and when such debilitating effects can be managed. More specifically, by drawing on the paradox theory and emotion literature, I suggest that paradoxical tension (i.e., the cognitive difficulty faced by senior managers as they pursue multiple, simultaneous competing demands of coopetition) creates a state of emotional ambivalence, which in turn, contributes negatively to coopetitive performance. I further propose that the negative consequences can be managed through organizational-level mechanisms, namely, emotional capability and balancing capability. The results show a full mediation of emotional ambivalence and a positive influence of balancing capability. Surprisingly, the moderating effect of emotional capability turns out to be negative. However, interestingly, the moderated-mediation result shows that a blend of higher balancing capability and lower emotional capability produces a positive indirect effect of tension on performance. The paper contributes to the research on strategy and organizational paradoxes.
机译:在本文中,我研究了如何以及为什么经历的自相矛盾的张力会恶化竞争能力,以及何时可以控制这种使人衰弱的效应。更具体地说,我通过借鉴悖论理论和情感文献,提出了自相矛盾的张力(即,高级管理人员在追求多种同时竞争的竞合需求时面临的认知困难)会造成一种情绪矛盾的状态,进而,对竞争能力产生负面影响。我进一步建议,负面后果可以通过组织层面的机制来管理,即情绪能力和平衡能力。结果表明,情绪矛盾情绪得到了充分的调解,并且对平衡能力产生了积极的影响。令人惊讶地,情绪能力的调节作用被证明是负面的。然而,有趣的是,适度调解的结果表明,较高的平衡能力和较低的情感能力的混合会产生紧张对表演的间接影响。本文为战略与组织悖论的研究做出了贡献。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号