...
首页> 外文期刊>Long Range Planning >The role of human and social board capital in driving CSR reporting
【24h】

The role of human and social board capital in driving CSR reporting

机译:人力和社会董事会资本在推动企业社会责任报告中的作用

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

The objective of this paper is to analyze the effect of the professional, technical and relational background (human and social capital) of outside directors on promoting firm CSR disclosure. Following the Hillman et al. (2000) taxonomy of board members, we classify outside directors as business experts, support specialists and community influential, and examine whether business and technical expertise or political ties in the boardroom affect CSR disclosure.This study confirms that not all outside directors are equally effective in improving CSR disclosure and that only certain kinds of outside directors, those classified as support specialists, help promote it. On the other hand, our findings also show that directors with previous experience as politicians affect CSR disclosure negatively, probably due to their interests in safeguarding their reputation within the company, in avoiding public scrutiny and in protecting their political connections. In addition, our set of analysis with interaction effects reveals that powerful CEOs have the incentive to promote CSR-related strategies and to convince business experts and support specialist directors to enhance profitable sustainability strategies and transparency in CSR disclosure. Nevertheless, the powerful CEO effect is not enough to compensate the negative role of political directors on CSR reporting. Therefore, this paper supports the theories in favor of analyzing the multiple configurations of corporate governance mechanisms by adopting a holistic approach, and the need to combine these configurations in order to analyze their impact on CSR behavior.
机译:本文的目的是分析外部董事的专业,技术和关系背景(人力和社会资本)对促进企业社会责任披露的影响。继希尔曼等。 (2000)对董事会成员进行分类,我们将外部董事分为业务专家,支持专家和有影响力的社区,并检查董事会中的业务和技术专长或政治联系是否会影响企业社会责任的披露。改善企业社会责任的信息披露,并且只有某些类型的外部董事(被归类为支持专家)可以促进其发展。另一方面,我们的发现还表明,以前有政客经验的董事会对CSR披露产生负面影响,这可能是由于他们有兴趣维护公司内部声誉,避免公众监督以及保护他们的政治联系。此外,我们通过互动效应进行的分析表明,有能力的首席执行官有动机促进与企业社会责任相关的战略,并说服业务专家和支持专业董事增强可盈利的可持续发展战略和企业社会责任披露的透明度。然而,强大的首席执行官效应不足以弥补政治总监对企业社会责任报告的负面影响。因此,本文支持通过采用整体方法来分析公司治理机制的多种配置的理论,并需要将这些配置进行组合以分析其对CSR行为的影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号