Measures of instruction for creative engagement: Making metacognition, modeling and creative thinking visible

摘要

AbstractThe purpose of the current study was to estimate reliability, internal consistency and construct validity of the Measure of Instruction for Creative Engagement (MICE) instrument. The MICE uses an iterative process of evidence collection and scoring through teacher observations to determine instructional domain ratings and overall scores. The results demonstrated the sound inter-observer reliability, teacher stability and score validity of the MICE. We found (a) a low proportion of rater variance (0.14–5.99%), (b) moderate to highly correlated within-teacher ratings ranging fromr(17) = 0.663,p < 0.01 tor(17) = 1.000,p < 0.01 and (c) a statistically-significant difference between classroom teachers and teaching artists,t(56) = 7.37,p = 0.000. These results relate to the development of classroom environment instruments and the substantive development of pedagogy that supports creative thinking and behaviours, both of which are a priority for enhancing teacher accountability and student learning.