首页> 外文期刊>Journal of food process engineering >Comparison of germination–parboiling, freeze–thaw cycle, and high pressure processing on the cooking quality of brown rice
【24h】

Comparison of germination–parboiling, freeze–thaw cycle, and high pressure processing on the cooking quality of brown rice

机译:发芽煮沸,冻融循环和高压处理对糙米蒸煮品质的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Three treatments, namely, germination-parboiling (GP), freeze-thaw cycle (FTC), and high pressure processing (HPP) were compared for different qualities of brown rice (BR): appearance characteristics, cooking time and texture, and compared with those of untreated BR and white rice. All these three methods significantly (p .05) reduced cooking time by 12-23% and hardness of cooked BR by 17-23% (except GP), but reduced chewiness and generated some cracks in rice kernel. Moreover, GP process resulted in the best springiness and chewiness, FTC held the original lightness of BR well and had loose structure after cooking, while HPP (500 MPa) showed the lowest cooking time and cooking loss. The results of this study show that these three treatments could improve majority of the cooking qualities of BR and provide better commercial processing opportunities. Practical applications This study successfully tackles the rough cooking properties of BR via three treatments: germination-parboiling (GP), freeze-thaw cycle (FTC), and high pressure processing (HPP). Among them, GP and HPP have been adopted for commercial applications and the products are getting increasingly accepted by Chinese consumers. FTC is a simple and effective processing method, which is rarely reported, and the expected cost of its equipment is less than 1/10 of that for HPP and 1/3 of GP. This research provides incentives for farmers and food processors to increase their incomes and it can also promote the development of whole grain foods focused to improve the health of consumers.
机译:比较了三种品质的糙米(BR)的发芽预煮(GP),冻融循环(FTC)和高压加工(HPP)这三种处理方法:外观特性,烹饪时间和质地,并与未经处理的BR和白米的那些。这三种方法均显着(p <.05)减少了12-23%的烹饪时间,煮熟的BR的硬度降低了17-23%(GP除外),但降低了咀嚼性并在米粒中产生了一些裂纹。此外,GP加工具有最佳的弹性和耐嚼性,FTC保持BR原有的轻度,并且在烹饪后具有松散的结构,而HPP(500 MPa)显示的烹饪时间和烹饪损失最短。这项研究的结果表明,这三种处理可以提高BR的大部分烹饪质量,并提供更好的商业加工机会。实际应用该研究通过三种处理方法成功解决了BR的粗糙烹饪特性:发芽预煮(GP),冻融循环(FTC)和高压处理(HPP)。其中,GP和HPP已被用于商业应用,并且该产品越来越受到中国消费者的接受。 FTC是一种简单有效的处理方法,鲜有报道,其设备的预期成本不到HPP的1/10和GP的1/3。这项研究为农民和食品加工者增加收入提供了诱因,也可以促进以改善消费者健康为重点的全谷类食品的开发。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Journal of food process engineering》 |2019年第5期|e13135.1-e13135.10|共10页
  • 作者单位

    Zhejiang Univ, Coll Biosyst Engn & Food Sci, 866 Yuhangtang Rd, Hangzhou 310058, Zhejiang, Peoples R China;

    Zhejiang Univ, Coll Biosyst Engn & Food Sci, 866 Yuhangtang Rd, Hangzhou 310058, Zhejiang, Peoples R China;

    McGill Univ, Dept Food Sci, Ste Anne De Bellevue, PQ, Canada;

    Zhejiang Univ, Coll Biosyst Engn & Food Sci, 866 Yuhangtang Rd, Hangzhou 310058, Zhejiang, Peoples R China;

    Agr Serv Ctr Zhengzi Town Rong Cty, Zigong, Peoples R China;

    Zhejiang Univ, Coll Biosyst Engn & Food Sci, 866 Yuhangtang Rd, Hangzhou 310058, Zhejiang, Peoples R China;

  • 收录信息 美国《科学引文索引》(SCI);美国《工程索引》(EI);
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-18 04:29:09

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号