首页> 外文期刊>Journal of documentation >References to e-texts in academic publications
【24h】

References to e-texts in academic publications

机译:在学术出版物中引用电子文本

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to explore roles of electronic texts (e-texts) in research enquiry in literary and historical studies, and to deepen the understanding of the nature of scholars' engagement with e-texts as primary materials. The study includes an investigation of references to e-texts and discussions about researchers' citation practices in interviews.rnDesign/methodology/approach - Qualitative methodology was used to explore scholars' interactions with e-texts in 30 research projects. A combination of quantitative and qualitative methods was used to examine citations and any other acknowledgments of e-texts in participants' prepublications and published works. In-depth semi-structured interviews provided data for findings about researchers' citation practices.rnFindings - Formal acknowledgments of e-texts do not represent the depth and breadth of researchers' interactions with e-texts. Assessments of the relevance and trustworthiness of e-texts, as well as considerations of disciplinary cultures, had some impact on researchers' citation practices. Research limitations/implications - The study was based on in-depth data-gathering from a small group of participants. It does not have any statistical significance and the findings cannot be generalized, but comparisons with other scholars in literary and historical studies are possible. The study indicated a need for further investigation of changing academic practices in general and citation practices in particular.rnPractical implications - The findings have implications for the development of standards and institutional support for research in the humanities.rnOriginality/value - The study provides new insights into the phenomenon of a very small number of citations of electronic sources in publications in the humanities, and considers issues related to citations from the perspective of changing academic cultures.
机译:目的-本文的目的是探索电子文本(e-text)在文学和历史研究中的研究探究中的作用,并加深对学者从事电子文本作为主要材料的理解。该研究包括对电子文本的引用进行调查,并在访谈中讨论研究人员的引用实践。rn设计/方法/方法-在30个研究项目中,使用定性方法研究了学者与电子文本的互动。定量和定性方法相结合,用于检查参与者预出版物和出版作品中电子文本的引用和其他任何认可。深入的半结构化访谈为研究人员的引用实践提供了数据。rn发现-对电子文本的正式承认并不代表研究人员与电子文本互动的深度和广度。对电子文本的相关性和可信度的评估,以及对学科文化的考虑,对研究人员的引用实践产生了一些影响。研究局限性/含义-该研究基于一小部分参与者的深入数据收集。它没有任何统计意义,也不能对研究结果进行概括,但是可以与其他学者进行文学和历史研究的比较。该研究表明有必要进一步研究改变一般的学术惯例,尤其是引用惯例的惯例。rn实践意义-研究结果对人文学科研究的标准和机构支持的制定具有意义。rn原创性/价值-该研究提供了新的见解讨论了人文出版物中很少引用电子资源的现象,并从不断变化的学术文化角度考虑了与引用有关的问题。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号