首页> 外文期刊>Journal of dairy science >Meta-analysis of effects of inoculation with homofermentative and facultative heterofermentative lactic acid bacteria on silage fermentation, aerobic stability, and the performance of dairy cows
【24h】

Meta-analysis of effects of inoculation with homofermentative and facultative heterofermentative lactic acid bacteria on silage fermentation, aerobic stability, and the performance of dairy cows

机译:荟萃分析接种同发性和兼性异发性乳酸菌对青贮饲料发酵,有氧稳定性和奶牛生产性能的影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Forages are usually inoculated with homofermentative and facultative heterofermentative lactic acid bacteria (LAB) to enhance lactic acid fermentation of forages, but effects of such inoculants on silage quality and the performance of dairy cows are unclear. Therefore, we conducted a meta-analysis to examine the effects of LAB inoculation on silage quality and preservation and the performance of dairy cows. A second objective was to examine the factors affecting the response to silage inoculation with LAB. The studies that met the selection criteria included 130 articles that examined the effects of LAB inoculation on silage quality and 31 articles that investigated dairy cow performance responses. The magnitude of the effect (effect size) was evaluated using raw mean differences (RMD) between inoculated and uninoculated treatments. Heterogeneity was explored by meta-regression and subgroup analysis using forage type, LAB species, LAB application rate, and silo scale (laboratory or farm-scale) as covariates for the silage quality response and forage type, LAB species, diet type [total mixed ration (TMR) or non-TMR], and the level of milk yield of the control cows as covariates for the performance responses. Inoculation with LAB (≥10~5 cfu/g as fed) markedly increased silage fermentation and dry matter recovery in temperate and tropical grasses, alfalfa, and other legumes. However, inoculation did not improve the fermentation of corn, sorghum, or sugarcane silages. Inoculation with LAB reduced Clostridia and mold growth, butyric acid pro- duction, and ammonia-nitrogen in all silages, but it had no effect on aerobic stability. Silage inoculation (>105 cfu/g as fed) increased milk yield and the response had low heterogeneity. However, inoculation had no effect on diet digestibility and feed efficiency. Inoculation with LAB improved the fermentation of grass and legume silages and the performance of dairy cows but did not affect the fermentation of corn, sorghum, and sugar cane silages or the aerobic stability of any silage. Further research is needed to elucidate how silage inoculated with homofermentative and facultative heterofermentative LAB improves the performance of dairy cows.
机译:通常用均发酵和兼性异发酵乳酸菌(LAB)接种牧草,以增强牧草的乳酸发酵,但是尚不清楚这类接种物对青贮饲料品质和奶牛性能的影响。因此,我们进行了荟萃分析,以研究乳酸菌接种对青贮饲料品质和保存以及奶牛性能的影响。第二个目的是研究影响对LAB青贮接种反应的影响因素。符合选择标准的研究包括130篇文章检查了LAB接种对青贮饲料质量的影响,以及31篇文章调查了奶牛的生产性能。使用接种和未接种治疗之间的原始均值差(RMD)评估效果的大小(效果大小)。通过荟萃回归和亚组分析,利用饲草类型,乳酸菌种类,乳酸菌施用量和筒仓规模(实验室或农场规模)作为青贮饲料品质响应和饲草类型,乳酸菌种类,饮食类型[总混合量]的协变量,探索了异质性比例(TMR)或非TMR],以及对照奶牛的产奶量作为性能响应的协变量。在温带和热带草,苜蓿和其他豆科植物中,LAB接种(进料量≥10〜5 cfu / g)显着提高了青贮饲料的发酵和干物质的回收率。但是,接种并不能改善玉米,高粱或甘蔗青贮饲料的发酵。 LAB接种减少了所有青贮饲料中梭菌和霉菌的生长,丁酸的产生以及氨氮,但对好氧稳定性没有影响。青贮接种(> 105 cfu / g,进料)提高了牛奶产量,且响应具有较低的异质性。但是,接种对日粮的消化率和饲料效率没有影响。 LAB接种可改善草类和豆类青贮饲料的发酵以及奶牛的性能,但不影响玉米,高粱和甘蔗青贮饲料的发酵或任何青贮饲料的需氧稳定性。需要进一步研究阐明用同型发酵和兼性异型发酵LAB接种青贮饲料如何改善奶牛的性能。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Journal of dairy science》 |2017年第6期|4587-4602|共16页
  • 作者单位

    lnstituto de Ciencias Agrarias e Ambientais, Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso, Campus Sinop, Sinop, MT 78557-267, Brazil,Department of Animal Sciences, University of Florida, Gainesville 32611;

    Department of Animal Sciences, University of Florida, Gainesville 32611,Department of Food Quality and Safety, Agricultural Research Organization, The Volcani Center, Bet Dagan 50250, Israel;

    Department of Animal Sciences, University of Florida, Gainesville 32611;

    Department of Animal Sciences, University of Florida, Gainesville 32611;

    Department of Animal Sciences, University of Florida, Gainesville 32611;

    Department of Animal Sciences, University of Florida, Gainesville 32611;

    Department of Animal Sciences, University of Florida, Gainesville 32611,Divtsion of Applied Life Science (BK21plus, Institute of Agriculture and Life Science), Gyeongsang National University, Jinju 52828, South Korea;

    Department of Animal Sciences, University of Florida, Gainesville 32611,lnstitute of Grassland Science, China Agricultural University, Beijing, 100193, China;

    Department of Animal Sciences, University of Florida, Gainesville 32611,Instituto Federal Goiano, Campus Rio Verde, Rio Verde, GO 75901, Brazil;

    Department of Animal Sciences, University of Florida, Gainesville 32611;

    Department of Animal Sciences, University of Florida, Gainesville 32611;

  • 收录信息 美国《科学引文索引》(SCI);美国《生物学医学文摘》(MEDLINE);美国《化学文摘》(CA);
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

    ensiling; Lactobacillus plantarum; Lactobacillus rhamnosus; Pediococcus pentosaceus;

    机译:包围植物乳杆菌;鼠李糖乳杆菌;戊糖小球菌;
  • 入库时间 2022-08-17 23:22:48

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号