首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Curriculum Studies >The ethical claim of partiality: practical reasoning, the discipline, and teacher education
【24h】

The ethical claim of partiality: practical reasoning, the discipline, and teacher education

机译:偏爱的伦理主张:实践推理,纪律和师范教育

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Practical reasoning refers to a teacher's capacity to discern particulars and make wise judgements about how to act in pedagogical situations. But how do teachers know what is right? How are teachers' preferences to be grounded and their choices justified? I explore the disciplines as one source of moral perception. Assuming that narrative unities underscore the coherence and continuity of an individual's experience, I generated data in the context of a 2-year teacher education programme. The case study of an aspiring teacher of secondary school language arts illustrates how the intellectual virtues of a discipline can influence a student teacher's practical reasoning. I conclude that teacher educators must attend to the complex ways in which a prospective teacher's prior discipline may influence aspiring teachers' orientations to experience, their consideration of educational ends, and, finally, their characters.
机译:实践性推理是指教师具有辨别细节并就如何在教学环境中做出明智判断的能力。但是老师怎么知道对的呢?如何根据老师的喜好和他们的选择合理化?我将这些学科视为道德观念的一种来源。假设叙事统一强调了个人经历的连贯性和连续性,我在为期两年的教师教育计划的背景下生成了数据。一位有抱负的中学语言艺术老师的案例研究表明,一门学科的知识美德如何影响学生老师的实践推理。我得出的结论是,教师教育者必须注意复杂的方式,以使准教师的先前学科可能影响有抱负的教师的体验取向,他们对教育目的的考虑以及最后他们的性格。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号