...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Computer Assisted Learning >Supporting pre-service teachers in designing technology-infused lesson plans
【24h】

Supporting pre-service teachers in designing technology-infused lesson plans

机译:支持职前教师设计融入技术的课程计划

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The present study compared the effectiveness of two types of just-in-time support for lesson planning. Both types contained the same technological information but differed regarding pedagogical and content information. The first type presented this information separately (i.e., separate support); the second type presented this information in an integrated way (i.e., integrated support). In an experimental design pre-service biology teachers received either the integrated support (n=26) or separate support (n=27). They were instructed to create a technology-infused lesson plan and justify their design decisions. Results showed that pre-service teachers who used the integrated support had more integrated pedagogical and content-related justifications and higher quality lesson plans than the group who received separate support. Both groups had few technology-related justifications, and technology integration was of low quality. These findings confirm the alleged superiority of integrated support over separate support, and suggest that additional guidance is needed for pre-service teachers to fully integrate technological, pedagogical and content information during lesson planning.
机译:本研究比较了两种即时授课计划的有效性。两种类型都包含相同的技术信息,但是在教学和内容信息上却有所不同。第一类分别提供此信息(即单独的支持);第二种以集成方式(即集成支持)显示此信息。在实验设计中,职前生物学教师获得了综合支持(n = 26)或单独的支持(n = 27)。他们被指示创建一个融合技术的课程计划,并证明他们的设计决定合理。结果表明,与获得单独支持的小组相比,使用了集成支持的职前教师在教学和与内容相关的论证方面更具整合性,并且课程计划质量更高。两组都没有与技术相关的理由,而且技术集成的质量很差。这些发现证实了所谓的综合支持优于单独的支持的优势,并建议在课程计划期间,岗前教师需要完全整合技术,教学和内容信息的其他指导。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号