首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Cleaner Production >Life cycle assessment of spray dried soluble coffee and comparison with alternatives (drip filter and capsule espresso)
【24h】

Life cycle assessment of spray dried soluble coffee and comparison with alternatives (drip filter and capsule espresso)

机译:喷雾干燥的可溶性咖啡的生命周期评估以及与替代品(滴滤器和胶囊浓缩咖啡)的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This paper aims to evaluate the environmental burdens associated with spray dried soluble coffee over its entire life cycle and compare it with drip filter coffee and capsule espresso coffee. It particularly aims to identify critical environmental issues and responsibilities along the whole life cycle chain of spray dried coffee. This life cycle assessment (LCA) specifically uses foreground data obtained directly from coffee manufacturers and suppliers. Aside from energy consumption and greenhouse gases emissions, water footprint is also studied in detail, including regionalization of water impacts based on the ecological scarcity method 2006. Other impact categories are screened using the IMPACT 2002+ impact assessment method.rnThe overall LCA results for a 1 dl cup of spray dried soluble coffee amounts approximately to 1 MJ of primary non-renewable energy consumption, to emissions of 0.07 kg of CO_(2-eq), and between 3 and 10 1 of non-turbined water use, depending on whether or not the coffee cultivation is irrigated and wet treated. When considering turbined water, use can be up to 4001 of water per cup. Pouch - and to a lesser extent metal can packaging alternatives - show lower environmental burdens than glass or sticks.rnOn average, about one half of the environmental footprint occurs at a life cycle stage under the control of the coffee producer or its suppliers (i.e., during cultivation, treatment, processing, packaging up to distribution, along with advertising) and the other half at a stage controlled by the user (shopping, appliances manufacturing, use and waste disposal). Key environmental parameters of spray dried soluble coffee are the amount of extra water boiled and the efficiency of cup cleaning during use phase, whether the coffee is irrigated or not, as well as the type and amount of fertilizer used in the coffee field. The packaging contributes to 10% of the overall life cycle impacts.rnCompared to other coffee alternatives, spray dried soluble coffee uses less energy and has a lower environmental footprint than capsule espresso coffee or drip filter coffee, the latter having the highest environmental impacts on a per cup basis. This study shows that a broad LCA approach is needed to help industry to minimize the environmental burdens directly related to their products. Including all processes of the entire system is necessary ⅰ) to get a comprehensive environmental footprint of the product system with respect to sustainable production and consumption, ⅱ) to share stakeholders responsibility along the entire product life cycle, and ⅲ) to avoid problem shifting between different life cycle stages.
机译:本文旨在评估与喷雾干燥可溶性咖啡有关的整个环境的环境负担,并将其与滴滤咖啡和胶囊浓缩咖啡进行比较。它特别旨在确定喷雾干燥咖啡整个生命周期链中的关键环境问题和责任。该生命周期评估(LCA)具体使用直接从咖啡制造商和供应商处获得的前景数据。除了能耗和温室气体排放外,还对水足迹进行了详细研究,包括根据2006年生态稀缺性方法对水影响进行分区。使用IMPACT 2002+影响评估方法筛选其他影响类别。 1 dl杯喷雾干燥的可溶性咖啡约等于1 MJ的主要不可再生能源消耗,相当于0.07 kg CO_(2-eq)的排放,以及3到10 1的非沸腾水用量,具体取决于是否咖啡种植是否经过灌溉和湿处理。当考虑使用汽水时,每杯水的用量最多为4001。与玻璃或棍棒相比,小袋-以及程度较小的金属罐包装替代品-所表现出的环境负担要小。rn平均而言,大约一半的环境足迹发生在咖啡生产商或其供应商(即咖啡生产商)控制下的生命周期中在种植,处理,加工,包装直至分发以及广告的过程中,另一半在用户控制的阶段(购物,电器制造,使用和废物处置)。喷雾干燥的可溶性咖啡的关键环境参数是煮沸过程中多余的水量和杯子清洁的效率,无论是否灌溉咖啡,以及咖啡领域使用的肥料的类型和数量。与其他咖啡替代品相比,喷雾干燥的可溶性咖啡与胶囊式浓缩咖啡或滴滤咖啡相比,能耗更低,并且对环境的影响更小,后者对胶囊式咖啡的环境影响最大。每杯基础。这项研究表明,需要广泛的LCA方法来帮助行业最大程度地减少与其产品直接相关的环境负担。包括整个系统的所有过程都是必要的。ⅰ)要获得产品系统在可持续生产和消费方面的综合环境足迹;ⅱ)在整个产品生命周期中分担利益相关者的责任;,)避免问题之间的转移不同的生命周期阶段。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号