首页> 外文期刊>Journal of bridge engineering >Optimum Combination of Bridge and Deck Systems for Superspan Cable-Stayed Bridges
【24h】

Optimum Combination of Bridge and Deck Systems for Superspan Cable-Stayed Bridges

机译:超跨斜拉桥桥与桥面系统的最佳组合

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The huge axial force in the main girder challenges the design of superspan cable-stayed bridges. To reduce the self-weight of the girder, the conventional orthotropic steel deck (OSD) system is widely adopted due to its high strength-to-weight ratio, which may generate fatigue problems. In this paper, the optimum combination of different bridge and deck systems was studied by designing a cable-stayed bridge with main span of 1,480 m. Two different bridge systems were investigated: the conventional cable-stayed bridge system and a partial ground-anchored cable-stayed bridge system with crossing stay cables (the new bridge system). Additionally, in each bridge system, three different deck systems were studied: the OSD system, a composite deck system composed of the OSD system and an ultrahigh-performance concrete (UHPC) layer, and an UHPC waffle deck panel system. Finite-element (FE) models of the six plans were developed and analyzed. The static, dynamic, and economic performances of the six plans were compared. Model tests of the composite and UHPC waffle panel systems were performed to ensure the feasibility of the design. Compared to the conventional bridge system, the new bridge system has a much smaller axial force in the main girder, greater longitudinal stiffness, and economic advantages. Under the traffic load, a much lower stress amplitude is developed in the girder with the UHPC waffle deck panel system than in girders with the other two deck systems. Compared to the OSD system, the composite and UHPC waffle panel systems are advantageous in terms of lifecycle cost. Therefore, the combination of the new bridge system and the UHPC waffle deck panel system is recommended as the optimal design plan. (C) 2017 American Society of Civil Engineers.
机译:主梁中巨大的轴向力对超跨斜拉桥的设计提出了挑战。为了降低大梁的自重,由于其高的重量重量比,通常会使用传统的正交异性钢甲板(OSD)系统,这会产生疲劳问题。通过设计主跨为1,480 m的斜拉桥,研究了不同桥面和桥面系统的最佳组合。研究了两种不同的桥梁系统:传统的斜拉桥系统和带有交叉斜拉索的局部接地锚固斜拉桥系统(新桥系统)。此外,在每个桥梁系统中,研究了三种不同的甲板系统:OSD系统,由OSD系统和超高性能混凝土(UHPC)层组成的复合甲板系统以及UHPC华夫格甲板面板系统。开发并分析了六个计划的有限元(FE)模型。比较了这六个计划的静态,动态和经济绩效。对复合材料和UHPC华夫格面板系统进行了模型测试,以确保设计的可行性。与传统的桥梁系统相比,新的桥梁系统在主梁中具有较小的轴向力,较大的纵向刚度和经济优势。在交通负荷下,与其他两个甲板系统的大梁相比,UHPC华夫格甲板面板系统在大梁中产生的应力幅值要低得多。与OSD系统相比,复合材料和UHPC华夫格面板系统在生命周期成本方面具有优势。因此,建议将新的桥梁系统和UHPC华夫格甲板系统的组合作为最佳设计方案。 (C)2017年美国土木工程师学会。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号