首页> 外文期刊>International Journal of Inclusive Education >Politics of inclusive education policy-making: the case of Cyprus 4784 (excluding references)
【24h】

Politics of inclusive education policy-making: the case of Cyprus 4784 (excluding references)

机译:包容性教育政策的政治制定:塞浦路斯4784案(不包括参考文献)

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Inclusive education policies constitute the contemporary legislative response to the education of disabled children. They can be viewed as the antidote to the historical imperatives of special education thinking, which were responsible for the disparagement and exclusion of disabled children. However, despite the extolling rhetorical proclamations that enthuse this ecumenical legislative shift, inclusive education policies can be characterized as 'hybrid legislative documents', in the sense that they attempt to fuse antithetical discourses in inconspicuous, yet destructive ways. In order to understand inclusive education policies and their hybrid nature, we should place them within a socio-historical context and scrutinize the context-specific forces that impact on their formulation and implementation. Defining as a spatial and chronological context the island of Cyprus in the outset of the twenty-first century, the current paper aims to provide the socio-historical and political backcloth against which the hybrid and contentious nature of inclusive education policies emerge and are reified. In particular, it will explore the following questions: what have been the major legislative reforms regarding special education? What were the historical, political and cultural factors that accounted for these changes? What is the current situation in relation to integration and inclusion ordinary in schools in Cyprus?
机译:包容性教育政策构成了对残疾儿童教育的当代立法对策。可以将它们视为特殊教育思想的历史要求的解毒剂,这些特殊要求导致了残障儿童的残障和排斥。然而,尽管赞美性的言论夸大了这种普世性的立法转变,但就融合性教育政策而言,它们试图以不引人注目但具有破坏性的方式融合对立的话语,因此可以将其称为“混合性立法文件”。为了理解全纳教育政策及其混合性质,我们应将其置于社会历史背景下,并仔细研究影响其制定和实施的特定背景力量。本文在二十一世纪初将塞浦路斯岛定义为一个空间和时间顺序的背景,旨在提供社会历史和政治方面的背景资料,包容性教育政策的混合性和争议性在此基础上应运而生。它将特别探讨以下问题:关于特殊教育的主要立法改革是什么?造成这些变化的历史,政治和文化因素是什么?与塞浦路斯学校的普通融合和融合有关的当前情况如何?

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号