首页> 外文期刊>Information technology & people >Coping with institutional complexity: Intersecting logics and dissonant visions in a nation-wide healthcare IT implementation project
【24h】

Coping with institutional complexity: Intersecting logics and dissonant visions in a nation-wide healthcare IT implementation project

机译:应对机构复杂性:在全国范围内的逻辑和不和谐愿景中的相互作用

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Purpose Digital transformation projects are complex, lengthy and difficult to implement, often failing to meet their objectives. Previous research has attributed this failure to competing institutional logics influencing actors' coping responses, and differences in actors' interpretations of the project's goals, technology and processes - their "organising vision". The purpose of this paper is to analyse a complex technology implementation project from an institutional perspective, to further elucidate the role of multiple logics and organising vision. Design/methodology/approach A qualitative single study approach was used to investigate a public-sector technology project aimed at delivering a unified Human resource information system (HRIS) across regional health organisations in one country. Findings Four logics characterised the project (public sector, professional, corporate and market), but their relative dominance shifted as the project transitioned through stages, from comprehension to implementation. These shifts exposed tensions between components of actors' organising vision, which influenced their coping behaviours in response to unexpected changes in the project's strategic ambitions and technological scope. Coherence of vision, both within groups of actors and between them, was a key mediator of coping responses and project outcomes. Originality/value This analysis demonstrates the role of actors' organising vision in bridging institutional logics and coping responses to shape digital transformation projects. It highlights the need to account not only for diverse institutional logics, but also for their changing influence as projects unfold and actors' attention is directed onto different aspects of the organising vision. From a management perspective, it illustrates the importance of clear and consistent communication, to avoid entrenching conflicting interpretations.
机译:目的数字转型项目复杂,漫长而难以实施,往往未能达到目标。以前的研究归功于这种失败,竞争了影响演员的制度逻辑,影响演员的应对反应,以及演员对项目目标,技术和流程的解释的差异 - 他们的“组织愿景”。本文的目的是从机构角度分析复杂的技术实施项目,以进一步阐明多种逻辑和组织愿景的作用。设计/方法/方法采用定性的单一学习方法来调查旨在在一个国家的区域卫生组织跨区域卫生组织提供统一的人力资源信息系统(HRIS)的公共部门技术项目。调查结果四种逻辑特征在于项目(公共部门,专业,公司和市场),但它们的相对优势随着阶段的转型而转移,从理解实施。这些转变了演员组织视野的组件之间的暴露紧张,这影响了他们的应对行为,以应对项目战略野心和技术范围的意外变化。愿景的一致性,无论是在演员和他们之间的一组,都是应对答复和项目结果的关键调解员。原创性/价值本分析表明演员组织呼吁在桥接制度逻辑和应对数字转型项目的回应中的作用。它强调了不仅针对各种机构逻辑的算帐,而且对于他们的影响以及行为者的注意力被引导到组织视野的不同方面。从管理角度来看,它说明了清晰和一致的沟通的重要性,以避免巩固冲突的解释。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号