首页> 外文期刊>Human Resource Management >The Employee Engagement Scale: Initial Evidence for Construct Validity and Implications for Theory and Practice
【24h】

The Employee Engagement Scale: Initial Evidence for Construct Validity and Implications for Theory and Practice

机译:员工敬业度量表:构造效度的初步证据以及对理论和实践的启示

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Interest in the employee engagement construct has gained increasing attention in recent years. Measurement tools focused on nuanced areas of engagement (i.e., job engagement and organizational engagement) have been offered; however, no measure of employee engagement has been advanced despite persistent calls in the research. We present the development, method, and results of a three-dimensional employee engagement measurement tool developed for use in the human resource and management fields of study. Across four independent studies, the employee engagement scale (EES) was found to consist of three subfactors (cognitive, emotional, and behavioral) and a higher-order factor (employee engagement). Across a series of four studies, we explored the factor structure and reliability of the EES (Study 1), then refined the scale, confirmed the factor structure, and examined reliability and both convergent and nomological validity evidence (Study 2). Next (Study 3), we completed a final reduction in scale items and examined additional evidence of reliability and nomological validity as well as evidence of discriminant validity. Finally (Study 4), we tested for evidence of incremental validity. In the implications for theory and practice section, we discuss the importance of an employee engagement measure aligned alongside an agreed-upon definition and framework. Limitations and future directions for researchsuch as the need for further psychometric testing and exploring issues of measurement invarianceare discussed. (c) 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
机译:近年来,对员工敬业度结构的兴趣日益受到关注。提供了针对细微的参与领域(即工作参与和组织参与)的衡量工具;然而,尽管研究人员不断呼吁,但仍没有提高员工敬业度的措施。我们介绍了开发用于人力资源和管理研究领域的三维员工敬业度测量工具的开发,方法和结果。在四项独立研究中,发现员工敬业度表(EES)由三个子因素(认知,情感和行为)和一个较高阶因素(员工敬业度)组成。在一系列四项研究中,我们探索了EES的因子结构和可靠性(研究1),然后完善了量表,确认了因子结构,并检查了可靠性以及收敛性和法理有效性证据(研究2)。接下来(研究3),我们完成了规模项目的最终缩减,并检查了可靠性和法理学有效性以及判别有效性的其他证据。最后(研究4),我们测试了递增有效性的证据。在理论和实践意义部分中,我们讨论了与约定的定义和框架保持一致的员工敬业度衡量的重要性。讨论了研究的局限性和未来的方向,例如需要进一步的心理测验和探索测量不变性的问题。 (c)2016年威利期刊有限公司

著录项

  • 来源
    《Human Resource Management》 |2017年第6期|953-977|共25页
  • 作者单位

    Univ Louisville, Dept Educ Leadership Evaluat & Org Dev, Louisville, KY 40292 USA|Univ Louisville, Dept Counseling & Human Dev, Louisville, KY 40292 USA|US Army, Cadet Command, Washington, DC 20310 USA|Leadership Engagement & Dev Lab LEADLab, Fullerton, CA USA;

    Univ Louisville, Educ Psychol Measurement & Evaluat Program, Louisville, KY 40292 USA;

    Florida Int Univ, Adult Educ & Human Resource Dev, Miami, FL 33199 USA|Florida Int Univ, Grad Studies, Miami, FL 33199 USA;

  • 收录信息 美国《科学引文索引》(SCI);
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

    employee engagement; human resource; human resource development; human resource management; scale development;

    机译:员工敬业度;人力资源;人力资源开发;人力资源管理;规模发展;

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号