首页> 外文期刊>Environment and planning >Explaining the urban premium in Chinese cities and the role of place-based policies
【24h】

Explaining the urban premium in Chinese cities and the role of place-based policies

机译:解释中国城市的城市溢价以及基于地方的政策的作用

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

This paper relies on the empirical framework introduced in Combes et al. (2012) to address the following main questions: (a) what are the relative contributions of agglomeration and selection forces expected to drive the urban productivity premium previously observed in Chinese cities, and (b) to what extent does the industrial parks and zones (IPZs) program, a popular place-based policy, simultaneously influence selection and agglomeration mechanisms? The main findings are as follows. First, both agglomeration and selection forces are observed in larger, denser Chinese cities, indicating that earlier studies that failed to take into account selection likely overestimate the effect of agglomeration economies. Second, after taking into account non-random site selection based on matching, the IPZs program intensifies both agglomeration and selection forces, although the results depend strongly on who administers the program. The empirical findings highlight a theoretical connection between state intervention and explaining the observed urban premium in a transitioning economy context.
机译:本文依赖于Combes等人介绍的实证框架。 (2012)根据以下主要问题解决以下主要问题:(a)预期的集聚和选拔部队的相对贡献是什么,以推动中国城市以前观察到的城市生产力溢价,(b)工业园区和地区( IPZS)计划,一个流行的基于地方的政策,同时影响选择和聚集机制?主要结果如下。首先,在更大的密集的中国城市中观察到聚集和选择力,表明早期的研究未能考虑到选择的可能性,可能会高估集聚经济的影响。其次,在考虑基于匹配的非随机站点选择之后,IPZS程序加剧了群凝聚和选择力,尽管结果依赖于管理该计划的谁。实证发现突出了国家干预与过渡经济背景下观察到的城市保费的理论联系。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号