首页> 外文期刊>Energy efficiency >The savings of energy saving: interactions between energy supply and demand-side options-quantification for Portugal
【24h】

The savings of energy saving: interactions between energy supply and demand-side options-quantification for Portugal

机译:节约能源:能源供应和需求方选择之间的相互作用-葡萄牙的量化

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Reducing demand by increasing end-use energy efficiency on the demand side of energy systems may also have advantages in reducing fossil dependency and greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions on the supply side. This paper addresses interactions between energy supply- and demand-side policies, by estimating the impact of measures addressing end-use energy efficiency and small-scale renewables uses in terms of (1) avoided large-scale electricity generation capacity, (2) final energy consumption, (3) share of renewables in final energy and (4) reduction of GHG emissions. The Portuguese energy system is used as a case study. The TIMESPT bottom-up model was used to generate four scenarios covering the period up to 2020, corresponding to different levels of efficiency of equipment in buildings, transport and industry. In the current policy scenario, the deployment of end-use equipment follows the 2000-2005 trends and the National Energy Efficiency Action Plan targets. In the efficient scenarios, all types of equipment can be replaced by more efficient ones. Results show that aggressive demand-side options for the industry and buildings sector and the small-scale use of renewables can remove the need for the increase in large-scale renewable electricity capacity by 4.7 GW currently discussed by policy makers. Although these measures reduce total final energy by only 0-2 %, this represents reductions of 11-14 % in the commercial sector, with savings in total energy system costs of approximately 3,000 million euros_(2000)-roughly equivalent to 2 % of the 2010 Portuguese GDP. The cost-effectiveness of policy measures should guide choices between supply shifts and demand reduction. Such balanced policy development can lead to substantial cost reductions in climate and energy policy.
机译:通过提高能源系统需求方面的最终用途能源效率来减少需求,在减少供应方的化石依赖性和温室气体排放方面也可能具有优势。本文通过评估针对最终用途能源效率和小规模可再生能源用途的措施的影响,从(1)避免大规模发电能力,(2)最终发电量等方面,解决了能源供需侧政策之间的相互作用。能源消耗;(3)可再生能源在最终能源中的份额;(4)减少温室气体排放。以葡萄牙的能源系统为例。 TIMESPT自下而上的模型用于生成四个情景,涵盖到2020年的时间段,对应于建筑物,运输和工业中设备效率的不同水平。在当前的政策情景中,最终用途设备的部署遵循2000-2005年的趋势以及《国家能源效率行动计划》的目标。在高效的情况下,所有类型的设备都可以用效率更高的设备代替。结果表明,针对工业和建筑业的积极的需求方选择以及可再生能源的小规模使用,可以消除决策者目前讨论的将大型可再生能源发电能力提高4.7吉瓦的需求。尽管这些措施仅使最终能源总量减少了0-2%,但在商业领域却减少了11-14%,能源系统的总成本节省了约30亿欧元_(2000)-大约相当于总能源消耗的2%。 2010年葡萄牙GDP。政策措施的成本效益应指导供应转移和减少需求之间的选择。这种平衡的政策制定可以导致气候和能源政策的成本大幅降低。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Energy efficiency》 |2014年第2期|179-201|共23页
  • 作者单位

    CENSE-Center for Environmental and Sustainability Research, Departamento de Ciencias e Engenharia do Ambiente, Faculdade de Ciencias e Tecnologia, Universidade Nova de Lisboa, 2829-516 Caparica, Portugal,CML-Institute of Environmental Sciences of the Leiden University, P.O. Box 9518, 2300 RA Leiden, The Netherlands,Currently at the European Commission-Joint Research Centre, Institute for Energy and Transport, P.O. Box 2, NL-1755ZG Petten, The Netherlands;

    CENSE-Center for Environmental and Sustainability Research, Departamento de Ciencias e Engenharia do Ambiente, Faculdade de Ciencias e Tecnologia, Universidade Nova de Lisboa, 2829-516 Caparica, Portugal;

    CENSE-Center for Environmental and Sustainability Research, Departamento de Ciencias e Engenharia do Ambiente, Faculdade de Ciencias e Tecnologia, Universidade Nova de Lisboa, 2829-516 Caparica, Portugal;

    CML-Institute of Environmental Sciences of the Leiden University, P.O. Box 9518, 2300 RA Leiden, The Netherlands;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

    End-use energy efficiency; Supply and demand side; Energy policies; Renewable electricity;

    机译:最终用途的能源效率;供需方面;能源政策;可再生电力;

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号