首页> 外文期刊>Energy Policy >Can energy supply-side and demand-side policies for energy saving and emission reduction be synergistic?- A simulated study on China's coal capacity cut and carbon tax
【24h】

Can energy supply-side and demand-side policies for energy saving and emission reduction be synergistic?- A simulated study on China's coal capacity cut and carbon tax

机译:能源侧和需求方的节能减排能源侧和需求方政策是协同作用的吗? - 中国煤炭能力削减和碳税的模拟研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Existing literature mainly focuses on the combined effect of different policies on energy, economy and environment. However, most of them were based on the perspective of energy demand-side. In order to fill this gap, we study the effect of carbon tax and coal capacity cut from both the energy demand-side and energy supply-side using a dynamic Computable General Equilibrium (CGE) model. Different policy effects including single one and synergistic one are compared. Moreover, the synergy degrees of coal capacity cut and carbon tax in energy saving, emission reduction and economic growth are evaluated. The results show that both coal capacity cut and carbon tax are beneficial to energy conservation and carbon emission mitigation at the expense of a slight loss in economy. Mixed policy has better performance than single policy in carbon emission reduction and energy saving. Also, a more stringent policy is conducive to carbon emission mitigation and energy conservation. Additionally, there are significant synergistic effect of coal capacity cut and carbon tax from the perspectives of energy saving, emission reduction and economic growth. Therefore, the mixed policy of coal capacity cut and carbon tax should be promoted and an appropriate stringency level of policy mix should be adopted.
机译:现有文学主要侧重于不同政策对能源,经济和环境的综合影响。然而,他们中的大多数是基于能量需求方的角度。为了填补这种差距,我们使用动态可计算的通用均衡(CGE)模型研究碳税和煤炭容量从能量需求 - 侧和能源供应侧的效果。比较包括单一和协同作用的不同政策效果。此外,评估了节能,减排和经济增长中的煤炭能力削减和碳税的协同应激程度。结果表明,煤炭能力削减和碳税都有利于节能和碳排放减缓,以牺牲经济略有损失。混合政策比在碳排放减少和节能中的单一政策具有更好的性能。此外,更严格的政策有利于碳排放缓解和节能。此外,煤炭容量削减和碳税具有显着的协同效应,从节能,减排和经济增长的角度。因此,应促进煤炭能力削减和碳税的混合政策,应采用适当的严格规则水平。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Energy Policy》 |2020年第3期|111232.1-111232.14|共14页
  • 作者

    Li Xiaoyu; Yao Xilong;

  • 作者单位

    Taiyuan Univ Technol Coll Econ & Management Taiyuan 030024 Peoples R China;

    Taiyuan Univ Technol Coll Econ & Management Taiyuan 030024 Peoples R China;

  • 收录信息 美国《科学引文索引》(SCI);美国《工程索引》(EI);
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

    Coal capacity cut; Carbon tax; CGE model; Synergy degree;

    机译:煤炭能力削减;碳税;CGE模型;协同程度;

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号