首页> 外文期刊>Educational Psychology Review >Assessing the Impact of Testing Aids on Post-Secondary Student Performance: A Meta-Analytic Investigation
【24h】

Assessing the Impact of Testing Aids on Post-Secondary Student Performance: A Meta-Analytic Investigation

机译:评估测试教具对大专生表现的影响:一项荟萃分析研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Testing aids, including student-prepared testing aids (a.k.a., cheat sheets or crib notes) and open-textbook exams, are common practice in post-secondary assessment. There is a considerable amount of published research that discusses and investigates the impact of these testing aids. However, the findings of this research are contradictory and inconclusive. The current meta-analytic investigation provides a general measure of the impact of both student-prepared testing aids and the use of open-textbook exams on student exam performance in post-secondary education, while examining variables that may moderate the effects of testing aids on student exam performance. The results indicate that, overall, testing aids can produce a moderate impact on student exam performance, with student-prepared testing aids associated with a larger effect (d=.402) relative to open-textbook exams (d = 0.257). The results are discussed in terms of their implications for college course instructors and for informing the broader debate about the role of testing aids in long-term student learning and mastery of course material.
机译:测试辅助工具,包括学生准备的测试辅助工具(也称为备忘单或婴儿床便笺)和公开课本考试,是中学后评估的常见做法。有大量已发表的研究讨论和调查了这些测试辅助工具的影响。但是,这项研究的结果是矛盾的,没有定论。当前的荟萃分析调查提供了一种通用的测量方法,既可以评估学生准备的测试工具的影响,也可以使用开放式课本考试对高中后学生考试成绩的影响,同时研究可以缓和测试工具在以下方面的影响的变量:学生考试成绩。结果表明,总体而言,测试辅助工具可以对学生的考试成绩产生适度的影响,相对于开放式课本考试(d = 0.257),学生准备的测试工具具有更大的效果(d = .402)。讨论了这些结果对他们对大学课程讲师的影响,以及为测试辅助工具在长期学生学习和掌握课程材料方面的作用提供了更广泛的讨论。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号