首页> 外文期刊>Educational Assessment >Estimating the Effect on Grades of Using Multiple-Choice Versus Constructive-Response Questions: Data From the Classroom
【24h】

Estimating the Effect on Grades of Using Multiple-Choice Versus Constructive-Response Questions: Data From the Classroom

机译:估计使用多项选择对建设性回答问题对成绩的影响:来自教室的数据

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This study investigates the degree to which grades based solely on constructed-response (CR) questions differ from grades based solely on multiple-choice (MC) questions. If CR questions are to justify their higher costs, they should produce different grade outcomes than MC questions. We use a data set composed of thousands of observations on individual students in introductory economics classes at a large public university. We note that the instructors of these classes made conscientious efforts to write CR questions that assessed higher levels of learning (Bloom, 19563. Bloom, B. S. 1956. Taxonomy of educational objectives: The classification of educational goals, handbook 1: Cognitive domain. New York: McKay.. View all references). Despite this, we find relatively little difference in grade outcomes. Our analysis suggests that switching from an all-CR assessment to an all-MC assessment would produce grade variations that are similar to the differences that are observed for students across different tests. Although other studies have focused on test scores, frequently AP test scores, our study is the first to focus attention on university grades. We hope that our inability to identify substantial benefits to CR questions in terms of grades will stimulate further research to identify substantive benefits from using the more costly CR questions.View full textDownload full textRelated var addthis_config = { ui_cobrand: "Taylor & Francis Online", services_compact: "citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,delicious,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,more", pubid: "ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b" }; var addthis_config = {"data_track_addressbar":true,"ui_click":true}; Add to shortlist Link Permalink http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10627197.2012.735915
机译:这项研究调查了仅基于构造反应(CR)问题的成绩与仅基于多项选择(MC)问题的成绩不同的程度。如果CR问题是为了证明其较高的成本是合理的,则应产生与MC问题不同的年级结果。我们使用由大型公立大学入门经济学课程中的个别学生的数千个观察值组成的数据集。我们注意到,这些课程的讲师做出了认真的努力,编写了评估较高学习水平的CR问题(Bloom,19563年。Bloom,BS 1956年。教育目标的分类法:教育目标的分类,手册1:认知领域。纽约) :McKay ..查看所有参考文献)。尽管如此,我们发现年级成绩的差异相对较小。我们的分析表明,从全CR评估转换为全MC评估将产生与学生在不同测试中观察到的差异相似的成绩变化。尽管其他研究都侧重于考试成绩,经常是AP考试成绩,但我们的研究还是第一个将注意力集中在大学成绩上的研究。我们希望我们无法根据成绩确定CR问题的实质性优势,这将刺激进一步的研究,以从使用成本更高的CR问题中识别出实质性的好处。查看全文下载全文相关的var addthis_config = {ui_cobrand:“ Taylor&Francis Online”, services_compact:“ citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,可口,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,更多”,发布:“ ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b”}; var addthis_config = {“ data_track_addressbar”:true,“ ui_click”:true};添加到候选列表链接永久链接http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10627197.2012.735915

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号