首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Journal of Microbiology Biology Education >Development of a New Scoring System To Accurately Estimate Learning Outcome Achievements via Single Best-Answer Multiple-Choice Questions for Preclinical Students in a Medical Microbiology Course
【2h】

Development of a New Scoring System To Accurately Estimate Learning Outcome Achievements via Single Best-Answer Multiple-Choice Questions for Preclinical Students in a Medical Microbiology Course

机译:开发一种新的评分系统以通过医学微生物学课程的临床前学生通过单项最佳答案和多项选择题准确地估计学习成果

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

During the preclinical years, single-best-answer multiple-choice questions (SBA-MCQs) are often used to test the higher-order cognitive processes of medical students (such as application and analysis) while simultaneously assessing lower-order processes (like knowledge and comprehension). Consequently, it can be difficult to pinpoint which learning outcome has been achieved or needs improvement. We developed a new scoring system for SBA-MCQs using a step-by-step methodology to evaluate each learning outcome independently. Enrolled in this study were third-year medical students ( = 316) who had registered in the basic microbiology course at the Faculty of Medicine, Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University during the academic year 2017. A step-by-step SBA-MCQ with a new scoring system was created and used as a tool to evaluate the validity of the traditional SBA-MCQs that assess two separate outcomes simultaneously. The scores for the two methods, in percentages, were compared using two different questions (SBA-MCQ1 and SBA-MCQ2). SBA-MCQ1 tested the students’ knowledge of the causative agent of a specific infectious disease and the basic characteristics of the microorganism, while SBA-MCQ2 tested their knowledge of the causative agent of a specific infectious disease and the pathogenic mechanism of the microorganism. The mean score obtained with the traditional SBA-MCQs was significantly lower than that obtained with the step-by-step SBA-MCQs (85.9% for the traditional approach versus 90.9% for step-by-step SBA-MCQ1; < 0.001; and 81.5% for the traditional system versus 87.4% for step-by-step SBA-MCQ2; < 0.001). Moreover, 65.8% and 87.8% of the students scored lower with the traditional SBA-MCQ1 and the traditional SBA-MCQ2, respectively, than with the corresponding sets of step-by-step SBA-MCQ questions. These results suggest that traditional SBA-MCQ scores need to be interpreted with caution because they have the potential to underestimate the learning achievement of students. Therefore, the step-by-step SBA-MCQ is preferable to the traditional SBA-MCQs and is recommended for use in examinations during the preclinical years.
机译:在临床前的几年中,单项最佳选择题(SBA-MCQ)通常用于测试医学生的高阶认知过程(例如应用程序和分析),同时评估低阶过程(例如知识)和理解力)。因此,可能难以确定已经达到或需要改进的学习成果。我们使用分步方法开发了一种针对SBA-MCQ的新评分系统,以独立评估每个学习结果。参加本研究的是三年级医学生(= 316),他们在2017学年期间已在Mahidol大学Siriraj医院的医学院进行了基础微生物学课程的注册。创建了新的评分系统,并将其用作评估传统SBA-MCQ(同时评估两个单独结果)的有效性的工具。使用两个不同的问题(SBA-MCQ1和SBA-MCQ2)比较两种方法的分数(以百分比表示)。 SBA-MCQ1测试了学生对特定传染病的病原体知识和微生物的基本特征,而SBA-MCQ2测试了学生对特定传染病的病原体知识和微生物的致病机理。传统SBA-MCQ获得的平均得分显着低于分步SBA-MCQ获得的平均得分(传统方法为85.9%,分步为SBA-MCQ1为90.9%; <0.001;以及传统系统为81.5%,逐步SBA-MCQ2为87.4%; <0.001)。此外,与传统的SBA-MCQ问题对应的组相比,使用传统的SBA-MCQ1和传统的SBA-MCQ2的学生的得分分别要低。这些结果表明,传统的SBA-MCQ分数需要谨慎解释,因为它们可能会低估学生的学习成绩。因此,分步式SBA-MCQ比传统的SBA-MCQ更可取,并建议在临床前期间用于检查。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号