首页> 外文期刊>Microbiology Education Journal >Development of a New Scoring System To Accurately Estimate Learning Outcome Achievements via Single, Best-Answer, Multiple-Choice Questions for Preclinical Students in a Medical Microbiology Course ?
【24h】

Development of a New Scoring System To Accurately Estimate Learning Outcome Achievements via Single, Best-Answer, Multiple-Choice Questions for Preclinical Students in a Medical Microbiology Course ?

机译:开发一项新的评分系统,通过单一,最佳答案,临床前学生在医疗微生物学课程中准确估计学习结果成果?

获取原文
           

摘要

During the preclinical years, single-best-answer multiple-choice questions (SBA-MCQs) are often used to test the higher-order cognitive processes of medical students (such as application and analysis) while simultaneously assessing lower-order processes (like knowledge and comprehension). Consequently, it can be difficult to pinpoint which learning outcome has been achieved or needs improvement. We developed a new scoring system for SBA-MCQs using a step-by-step methodology to evaluate each learning outcome independently. Enrolled in this study were third-year medical students (n = 316) who had registered in the basic microbiology course at the Faculty of Medicine, Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University during the academic year 2017. A step-by-step SBA-MCQ with a new scoring system was created and used as a tool to evaluate the validity of the traditional SBA-MCQs that assess two separate outcomes simultaneously. The scores for the two methods, in percentages, were compared using two different questions (SBA-MCQ1 and SBA-MCQ2). SBA-MCQ1 tested the students’ knowledge of the causative agent of a specific infectious disease and the basic characteristics of the microorganism, while SBA-MCQ2 tested their knowledge of the causative agent of a specific infectious disease and the pathogenic mechanism of the microorganism. The mean score obtained with the traditional SBA-MCQs was significantly lower than that obtained with the step-by-step SBA-MCQs (85.9% for the traditional approach versus 90.9% for step-by-step SBA-MCQ1; p 0.001; and 81.5% for the traditional system versus 87.4% for step-by-step SBA-MCQ2; p 0.001). Moreover, 65.8% and 87.8% of the students scored lower with the traditional SBA-MCQ1 and the traditional SBA-MCQ2, respectively, than with the corresponding sets of step-by-step SBA-MCQ questions. These results suggest that traditional SBA-MCQ scores need to be interpreted with caution because they have the potential to underestimate the learning achievement of students. Therefore, the step-by-step SBA-MCQ is preferable to the traditional SBA-MCQs and is recommended for use in examinations during the preclinical years.
机译:在临床前几年期间,单次最答案的多项选择题(SBA-MCQ)通常用于测试医学生(如应用程序和分析)的高阶认知过程,同时评估低阶过程(如知识和理解)。因此,可以难以确定已经实现了学习结果或需要改进的精确度。我们使用逐步的方法为SBA-MCQS开发了一个新的评分系统,以便独立评估每个学习结果。在本研究中注册是第三年的医学生(n = 316),他们在2017年学年期间在Mahidol大学Siriraj医院Siriraj医院的基本微生物学课程中注册了一步。一步一步的SBA-MCQ创建了一个新的评分系统并用作评估传统SBA-MCQ的有效性,以同时评估两个单独的结果。使用两种不同的问题(SBA-MCQ1和SBA-MCQ2)进行比较这两种方法的分数。 SBA-MCQ1测试了学生对特异性传染病的致病剂的知识和微生物的基本特征,而SBA-MCQ2测试了他们对特异性传染病的致病剂和微生物的致病机制的了解。用传统的SBA-MCQ获得的平均得分显着低于逐步SBA-MCQ获得的分数(对于传统方法的85.9%,与步骤逐步SBA-MCQ1的90.9%; P <0.001;对于传统系统的81.5%,对逐步的SBA-MCQ2的87.4%; P <0.001)。此外,65.8%和87.8%的学生分别与传统的SBA-MCQ1和传统的SBA-MCQ2和传统的SBA-MCQ2相当得分,而不是与相应的逐步的SBA-MCQ问题集得分。这些结果表明,传统的SBA-MCQ分数需要谨慎解释,因为他们有可能低估学生的学习成就。因此,逐步的SBA-MCQ优选对传统的SBA-MCQs,并建议在临床前年期间用于考试。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号