首页> 外文期刊>Education management administration & leadership >Complexity Theory, School Leadership and Management: Questions for Theory and Practice
【24h】

Complexity Theory, School Leadership and Management: Questions for Theory and Practice

机译:复杂性理论,学校领导与管理:理论与实践问题

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Complexity theory (CT) has had a meteoric rise in management literature and the social sciences. Its fledgling importation into school leadership and management raises several questions and concerns. This article takes one view of CT and argues that, though its key elements have much to offer school leadership and management, caution has to be exercised in accepting CT too readily, as it: (1) is unclear on its own novelty, nature and status; (2) can be regarded as disguised ideology in conflating description and prescription; (3) confuses explanation with prediction; (4) is relativist, undermining its own status; (5) contains problems in its advocacy of self-organization; (6) neglects the ethical and emotional dimensions of leadership and management; and (7) risks exonerating school leaders and managers from reasonable expectations of accountability and responsibility. The article concludes that there are questions to CT at the levels of theory, ontology, deontology and ethics, but that it offers useful challenges for school leadership and management.
机译:复杂性理论(CT)在管理文学和社会科学领域迅速崛起。它刚进入学校领导和管理的过程提出了一些问题和疑虑。本文从CT的观点出发,认为,尽管CT的关键要素在很多方面可以提供学校领导和管理的功能,但是在接受CT时也要谨慎行事,因为它:(1)不清楚其新颖性,性质和适用性。状态; (2)在混淆描述和处方时可被视为变相的思想; (3)将解释与预测混淆; (4)是相对主义者,破坏了自己的地位; (5)在倡导自组织方面存在问题; (6)忽视领导和管理的道德和情感层面; (7)冒着使学校领导者和管理者脱离对问责制和责任制的合理期望的风险。文章得出的结论是,CT在理论,本体论,道义论和伦理学等层面都存在问题,但它为学校的领导和管理提出了有益的挑战。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号