首页> 外文期刊>Economics letters >Same, but different? Testing monetary policy shock measures
【24h】

Same, but different? Testing monetary policy shock measures

机译:一样,但是不同?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

In this study, we determine the reliability and exogeneity of four popular monetary policy shock measures, namely the narrative series of Romer and Romer (2004), the high-frequency series of Barakchian and Crowe (2013), the high-frequency series of Gertler and Karadi (2015), and the hybrid series of Miranda-Agrippino and Ricco (2018b). To this end, we employ the Proxy-SVAR model and different empirical diagnostic tools to determine the shock measures' information content. We find that the measure of Miranda-Agrippino and Ricco (2018b), combining the insights from the narrative approach and high-frequency identification, outperforms the other three series. (C) 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
机译:在这项研究中,我们确定四种流行的货币政策冲击措施的可靠性和外生性,即罗默和罗默的叙事系列(2004年),巴拉克安和克劳的高频系列(2013年),格特勒的高频系列和Karadi(2015),以及Miranda-Agrippino和Ricco(2018b)的混合系列。为此,我们采用Proxy-SVAR模型和不同的经验诊断工具来确定电击措施的信息内容。我们发现,结合叙事方法和高频识别的见识,Miranda-Agrippino和Ricco(2018b)的衡量指标优于其他三个系列。 (C)2019 Elsevier B.V.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号