首页> 外文期刊>BMC Medical Ethics >The ethics of machine learning-based clinical decision support: an analysis through the lens of professionalisation theory
【24h】

The ethics of machine learning-based clinical decision support: an analysis through the lens of professionalisation theory

机译:基于机器学习的临床决策支持的伦理:通过专业理论镜头分析

获取原文
           

摘要

Machine learning-based clinical decision support systems (ML_CDSS) are increasingly employed in various sectors of health care aiming at supporting clinicians’ practice by matching the characteristics of individual patients with a computerised clinical knowledge base. Some studies even indicate that ML_CDSS may surpass physicians’ competencies regarding specific isolated tasks. From an ethical perspective, however, the usage of ML_CDSS in medical practice touches on a range of fundamental normative issues. This article aims to add to the ethical discussion by using professionalisation theory as an analytical lens for investigating how medical action at the micro level and the physician–patient relationship might be affected by the employment of ML_CDSS. Professionalisation theory, as a distinct sociological framework, provides an elaborated account of what constitutes client-related professional action, such as medical action, at its core and why it is more than pure expertise-based action. Professionalisation theory is introduced by presenting five general structural features of professionalised medical practice: (i) the patient has a concern; (ii) the physician deals with the patient’s concern; (iii) s/he gives assistance without patronising; (iv) s/he regards the patient in a holistic manner without building up a private relationship; and (v) s/he applies her/his general expertise to the particularities of the individual case. Each of these five key aspects are then analysed regarding the usage of ML_CDSS, thereby integrating the perspectives of professionalisation theory and medical ethics. Using ML_CDSS in medical practice requires the physician to pay special attention to those facts of the individual case that cannot be comprehensively considered by ML_CDSS, for example, the patient’s personality, life situation or cultural background. Moreover, the more routinized the use of ML_CDSS becomes in clinical practice, the more that physicians need to focus on the patient’s concern and strengthen patient autonomy, for instance, by adequately integrating digital decision support in shared decision-making.
机译:基于机器学习的临床决策支持系统(ML_CDSS)越来越多地在旨在通过匹配计算机化临床知识库的个体患者的特征来支持临床医生的实践。有些研究甚至表明ML_CDSS可能超过医生对特定分离任务的能力。然而,从道德的观点来看,ML_CDS在医学实践中的使用涉及一系列基本规范性问题。本文旨在通过使用专业化理论作为分析镜头来增加道德讨论,以调查微观水平和医师关系的医生关系如何受ML_CDS的影响。作为一个不同的社会学框架,专业化理论提供了阐述的构成客户相关的专业行动,例如医疗行动,如医疗行动,以及为什么它不仅仅是纯粹的专业知识行动。推出专业化理论的推出,推出了专业医疗实践的五个一般结构特征:(i)患者有一个令人担忧的; (ii)医生涉及患者的关注; (iii)他/他在不光顾的情况下提供帮助; (iv)他/他以全面的方式对患者提供了不建立私人关系的关注; (v)他/他/他将她/他的一般专业知识应用于个人案件的特殊性。然后分析这五个关键方面的每一个关于ML_CDS的使用,从而整合了专业理论和医学伦理的视角。在医疗实践中使用ML_CDS,要求医生特别关注无法通过ML_CDS全面考虑的个人案件的事实,例如患者的个性,生活形势或文化背景。此外,ML_CDSS的使用越常规,医生需要关注患者的关注和加强患者自主权,例如,通过在共享决策中充分整合数字决策支持来越来越多地。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号