...
首页> 外文期刊>Disease markers >CPH-I and HE4 Are More Favorable Than CA125 in Differentiating Borderline Ovarian Tumors from Epithelial Ovarian Cancer at Early Stages
【24h】

CPH-I and HE4 Are More Favorable Than CA125 in Differentiating Borderline Ovarian Tumors from Epithelial Ovarian Cancer at Early Stages

机译:CPH-I和HE4比在早期阶段从上皮细胞卵巢癌中区分边缘线卵巢肿瘤的CA125更有利

获取原文
           

摘要

Aim. To evaluate the diagnosis value of serum human epididymis protein 4 (HE4), cancer antigen 125 (CA125), the Risk of Ovarian Malignancy Algorithm (ROMA), and Copenhagen Index (CPH-I) at early stages for differentiating borderline ovarian tumors from epithelial ovarian cancer. Methods. We recruited 144 borderline ovarian tumors in FIGO stages I and II (BOT I+II), 108 epithelial ovarian cancers in FIGO stages I and II (EOC I+II), and 238 benign ovarian tumor patients with surgical treatment in the retrospective study. The concentration of HE4 and CA125 and the values of CPH-I and ROMA were assessed separately. Results. The HE4 level and ROMA and CPH-I values of EOC I+II were all higher than that of BOT I+II and benign groups whether in all, pre-, or postmenopausal groups (P0.01). When distinguishing BOT I+II from EOC I+II, the AUC-ROC of CPH-I and HE4 were bigger than CA125 (P0.001), while the CPH-I has the highest sensitivities in all and postmenopausal groups (78.7%, 85.1%), and HE4 has the highest specificity and PPV (90.91%, 88.64%) in postmenopausal groups. Under pathological stratification, HE4, ROMA, and CPH-I of the serous EOC I+II were higher than that of BOT I+II (P0.001) and the AUC of the three indices were significantly bigger than CA125 (P0.001). However, the concentration of HE4 and CA125 and the values of CPH-I and ROMA have no significant difference between the two endometrioid subgroups. The index with the highest sensitivity and NPV among the four indices of different pathological subtype groups was CPH-I, and the index with the highest specificities and PPV was HE4. Conclusion. CPH-I was more valuable than CA125 for differentiating BOT I+II from EOC I+II regardless of menopausal status, while HE4 might be better than CA125 for postmenopausal subgroups. HE4 and CPH-I were more favorable than CA125 for differentiating BOT I+II from EOC I+II in the case of unknown pathology or in serous type.
机译:目标。为了评估血清人物附睾蛋白4(HE4),癌症抗原125(CA125)的诊断值,卵巢恶性算法(ROMA)的风险,以及在早期阶段的卵巢恶性算法(CPH-I),用于区分边缘卵巢肿瘤从上皮细胞卵巢癌。方法。我们在Figo阶段I和II(BOT I + II)中招募了144个边缘卵巢肿瘤,在FIGO阶段I和II(EoC I + II)中的108个上皮细胞卵巢癌,以及在回顾性研究中进行手术治疗的238名良性卵巢肿瘤患者。单独评估HE4和Ca125的浓度和CPH-I和ROMA的值。结果。 EOC I + II的HE4水平和ROMA和CPH-I值全部高于BOT I + II和良性组,无论是全部,预期还是绝经后群体(P <0.01)。在从EoC I + II中区分BOT I + II时,CPH-I和HE4的AUC-ROC大于CA125(P <0.001),而CPH-I在所有和绝经后群体中具有最高的敏感性(78.7%, 85.1%),HE4在绝经后群体中具有最高的特异性和PPV(90.91%,88.64%)。在病理分层下,Serous Eoc I + II的HE4,ROMA和CPH-I高于BOT I + II的(P <0.001),三个指数的AUC显着大于CA125(P <0.001) 。然而,HE4和Ca125的浓度和CPH-I和ROMA的值在两个子宫内甲型子组之间没有显着差异。在不同病理亚型组的四个指数中具有最高敏感性和NPV的指标是CPH-I,特异性最高和PPV的指数是HE4。结论。 CPH-I比CA125更有价值,用于区分BOT I + II,无论更年期状态如何,HE4可能比绝经后亚组的CA125更好。 HE4和CPH-I比CA125更有利,用于在未知病理学或浆液型的情况下从EOC I + II区分BOT I + II。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号