...
首页> 外文期刊>Genetics and molecular biology: publication of the Sociedade Brasileira de Genetica >Determining the pathogenicity of CFTR missense variants: Multiple comparisons of in silico predictors and variant annotation databases
【24h】

Determining the pathogenicity of CFTR missense variants: Multiple comparisons of in silico predictors and variant annotation databases

机译:确定CFTR密码变体的致病性:Silico预测器和变体注释数据库中的多种比较

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Pathogenic variants in the Cystic Fibrosis Transmembrane Conductance Regulator gene (CFTR) are responsible for cystic fibrosis (CF), the commonest monogenic autosomal recessive disease, and CFTR-related disorders in infants and youth. Diagnosis of such diseases relies on clinical, functional, and molecular studies. To date, over 2,000 variants have been described on CFTR (~40% missense). Since few of them have confirmed pathogenicity, in silico analysis could help molecular diagnosis and genetic counseling. Here, the pathogenicity of 779 CFTR missense variants was predicted by consensus predictor PredictSNP and compared to annotations on CFTR2 and ClinVar. Sensitivity and specificity analysis was divided into modeling and validation phases using just variants annotated on CFTR2 and/or ClinVar that were not in the validation datasets of the analyzed predictors. After validation phase, MAPP and PhDSNP achieved maximum specificity but low sensitivity. Otherwise, SNAP had maximum sensitivity but null specificity. PredictSNP, PolyPhen-1, PolyPhen-2, SIFT, nsSNPAnalyzer had either low sensitivity or specificity, or both. Results showed that most predictors were not reliable when analyzing CFTR missense variants, ratifying the importance of clinical information when asserting the pathogenicity of CFTR missense variants. Our results should contribute to clarify decision making when classifying the pathogenicity of CFTR missense variants.
机译:囊性纤维化跨膜电导调节剂基因(CFTR)的致病变体负责囊性纤维化(CF),最常见的单一的常染色体隐性疾病和婴儿和青年的CFTR相关疾病。这种疾病的诊断依赖于临床,功能和分子研究。迄今为止,已在CFTR上描述了超过2,000种变体(〜40%的致命)。由于其中很少有证实致病性,因此在硅分析中可以帮助分子诊断和遗传咨询。在这里,通过共识预测仪预测,预测779CFTR密码变体的致病性,并与CFTR2和CLINVAR上的注释相比。使用CFTR2和/或CLINVAR在分析的预测器的验证数据集中注释的变体,敏感性和特异性分析分为建模和验证阶段。验证阶段后,MAPP和PHDSNP实现了最大特异性但低灵敏度。否则,Snap具有最大敏感性,但无效。预测,Polyphen-1,Polyphen-2,Sift,NSSnpanalyzer具有低灵敏度或特异性,或两者。结果表明,在分析CFTR密码变种时,大多数预测因子都不可靠,批准临床信息在断言CFTR密码变种的致病性时的重要性。我们的结果应该有助于澄清分类CFTR密码变种的致病性时决策。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号