首页> 外文期刊>International braz j urol >Comparison of two different suture techniques in laparoscopic partial nephrectomy
【24h】

Comparison of two different suture techniques in laparoscopic partial nephrectomy

机译:腹腔镜部分肾切除术中两种不同缝合技术的比较

获取原文

摘要

Objective: To comparatively evaluate the traditional interrupted knot-tying and running suture renorrhaphy with Monocryl? in laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (LPN). Materials and Methods: A retrospective analysis of 62 consecutive patients undergoing LPN using traditional interrupted knot-tying suture renorrhaphy (Group 1; n=31) or running suture technique renorrhaphy with 2-0 monofilament polyglecaprone (Monocryl?, Ethicon) (Group 2; n=31) from December 2011 to October 2015 at the University. All patients underwent LPN performed by an experienced laparoscopic surgeon. The demographic, perioperative and postoperative parameters were compared between the groups, and the effect of both suture techniques on the warm ischemic time (WIT) and trifecta were evaluated. Results: The running suture renorrhaphy with Monocryl? reduced WIT, estimated blood lost and length of hospitalization stay significantly without increasing postoperative complication rate during LPN in comparison with interrupted knot-tying suture. Conclusion: The renorrhaphy using the running suture with Monocryl? is an effective and safe technique with the advantage of shortening WIT even in more challenging and larger tumors during LPN.
机译:目的:用单晶体相比评价传统的中断结和缝合缝合缝合术术?在腹腔镜部分肾切除术(LPN)中。材料和方法:使用传统中断结栓缝合术(组1; n = 31)或用2-0单丝多丝荷兰(Monocryl', ethicon)(第2组; 2组; n = 31)从2011年12月到2015年10月在大学。所有患者均经过经验丰富的腹腔镜外科医生进行的患者。在组之间比较了人口,围手术期和术后参数,并评估了缝合技术对温暖缺血时间(机智)和三螺纹的影响。结果:与单胶合器的运行缝合术术?与中断结缝合缝合相比,减少机智,估计血液损失和住院时间的长度显着,而不会增加LPN期间的术后并发症率。结论:用单聚体运行缝合线的重年旋流?是一种有效且安全的技术,即使在LPN期间更具挑战性和较大的肿瘤,也是一种有效和安全的技术。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号