首页> 外文期刊>Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences >Critical Discourse Analysis as an Interdisciplinary Research Methodology for Interdisciplinary, Intercultural and an Inter-institutional Assessment Tool for Student-perceived Learning Compared with Instructor-perceived Teaching of Interdisciplinary Online Courses
【24h】

Critical Discourse Analysis as an Interdisciplinary Research Methodology for Interdisciplinary, Intercultural and an Inter-institutional Assessment Tool for Student-perceived Learning Compared with Instructor-perceived Teaching of Interdisciplinary Online Courses

机译:批判性话语分析作为跨学科,跨文化和跨机构评估工具的跨学科研究方法,用于学生感知学习与教师感知的跨学科在线课程教学

获取原文
       

摘要

Examining perceived effectiveness of learning objectives and outcomes from a pluralistic view using critical discourse analysis (CDA) will produce analytics from language, discourse practices, and discursive events. Although traditional assessment methods of student learning objectives and outcomes provide feedback regarding learning objectives, results are one-dimensional, often ignore diverse learning styles, lack interdisciplinary synthesis, and rarely consider diverse cultural frameworks of students and instructors. Reasons for assessing student-perceived learning and instructor-perceived teaching of Interdisciplinary Online Courses include (a) the perceptions that are often held as notions of truth, are promoted as truths; (b) student perceived-learning is analogous to a consumer's perceived-value of a service; and most importantly, (c) learning outcome-assessment is the measurement for institutional effectiveness.
机译:使用批判性话语分析(CDA)从多元化的角度检查学习目标和结果的感知有效性将产生来自语言,话语实践和话语事件的分析。尽管传统的学生学习目标和结果评估方法提供了有关学习目标的反馈,但结果是一维的,常常忽略了不同的学习方式,缺乏跨学科综合,很少考虑学生和教师的多元文化框架。评估跨学科在线课程的学生感知学习和教员感知教学的原因包括:(a)通常被认为是真理的观念被提升为真理; (b)学生的感知学习类似于消费者对服务的感知价值;最重要的是,(c)学习成果评估是对制度有效性的衡量。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号