首页> 外文期刊>BMC Public Health >A comparative assessment of major international disasters: the need for exposure assessment, systematic emergency preparedness, and lifetime health care
【24h】

A comparative assessment of major international disasters: the need for exposure assessment, systematic emergency preparedness, and lifetime health care

机译:重大国际灾难的比较评估:需要进行暴露评估,系统的应急准备和终生医疗保健

获取原文
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Background The disasters at Seveso, Three Mile Island, Bhopal, Chernobyl, the World Trade Center (WTC) and Fukushima had historic health and economic sequelae for large populations of workers, responders and community members. Methods Comparative data from these events were collected to derive indications for future preparedness. Information from the primary sources and a literature review addressed: i) exposure assessment; ii) exposed populations; iii) health surveillance; iv) follow-up and research outputs; v) observed physical and mental health effects; vi) treatment and benefits; and vii) outreach activities. Results Exposure assessment was conducted in Seveso, Chernobyl and Fukushima, although none benefited from a timely or systematic strategy, yielding immediate and sequential measurements after the disaster. Identification of exposed subjects was overall underestimated. Health surveillance, treatment and follow-up research were implemented in Seveso, Chernobyl, Fukushima, and at the WTC, mostly focusing on the workers and responders, and to a lesser extent on residents. Exposure-related physical and mental health consequences were identified, indicating the need for a long-term health care of the affected populations. Fukushima has generated the largest scientific output so far, followed by the WTCHP and Chernobyl. Benefits programs and active outreach figured prominently in only the WTC Health Program. The analysis of these programs yielded the following lessons: 1) Know who was there; 2) Have public health input to the disaster response; 3) Collect health and needs data rapidly; 4) Take care of the affected; 5) Emergency preparedness; 6) Data driven, needs assessment, advocacy. Conclusions Given the long-lasting health consequences of natural and man-made disasters, health surveillance and treatment programs are critical for management of health conditions, and emergency preparedness plans are needed to prevent or minimize the impact of future threats.
机译:背景塞维索,三英里岛,博帕尔,切尔诺贝利,世界贸易中心(WTC)和福岛的灾难给大量工人,响应者和社区成员带来了历史性的健康和经济后遗症。方法收集这些事件的比较数据,以得出未来备灾的迹象。来自主要来源的信息和文献综述涉及:i)暴露评估; ii)暴露人群; iii)健康监测; iv)后续和研究成果; v)观察到的身心健康影响; vi)待遇和利益;和vii)宣传活动。结果在塞维索,切尔诺贝利和福岛进行了暴露评估,尽管没有一项评估得益于及时或系统的策略,在灾难发生后可以立即进行评估。总体上低估了对暴露对象的识别。在塞维索,切尔诺贝利,福岛和世贸中心进行了健康监测,治疗和后续研究,主要侧重于工人和应急人员,而次要针对居民。确定了与接触有关的身心健康后果,表明需要对受影响人群进行长期保健。迄今为止,福岛岛的科学产出最大,其次是WTCHP和切尔诺贝利。福利计划和积极的外展活动仅在WTC健康计划中占突出地位。对这些程序的分析产生了以下教训:1)知道谁在那里; 2)为灾害应对提供公共卫生投入; 3)快速收集健康和需求数据; 4)照顾受影响的人; 5)应急准备; 6)数据驱动,需求评估,宣传。结论鉴于自然和人为灾害对健康造成的长期后果,健康监测和治疗计划对于健康状况的管理至关重要,因此需要应急计划以防止或最大程度地减少未来威胁的影响。

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号